Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov 1;97(1):635–646. doi: 10.1152/jn.00915.2006

Table 1.

Comparisons of mEPSC properties in bushy and stellate cells at different ages.

P7 P14 P21 ANOVA p value
Bushy cell (N) 6 6 9
Frequency (Hz) 0.2 ± 0.3 7.3 ± 5.5** 5.7 ± 4.4* 0.0190*
Amplitude (pA) −61 ± 28 −80 ± 30 −77 ± 25 0.4293
10–90% rise time (ms) 0.18 ± 0.08 0.13 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.01* 0.0684
Decay tau (ms) 0.47 ± 0.12 0.26 ± 0.13** 0.19 ± 0.05** 0.0002**
Stellate cell (N) 10 7 5
Frequency (Hz) 0.8 ± 1.3 1.7 ± 2.6 1.7 ± 2.0 0.5864
Amplitude (pA) −58 ± 16 (n=9) −52 ± 18 −53 ± 17 0.7868
10–90% rise time (ms) 0.18 ± 0.07 (n=9) 0.18 ± 0.05 0.20 ± 0.10 0.8473
Decay tau (ms) 0.48 ± 0.34 (n=9) 0.46 ± 0.22 0.53 ± 0.37 0.9127

Means and standard deviations are shown. N: number of cells;

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

ANOVA, and post hoc Fisher’s tests (between P14 and P7, or P21 and P7); no significant difference was detected in any of the parameters between P14 and P21 in both cell types at any age.