Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep 15;3(4):A116.

Table 3.

Mean Responsesa to Survey About Walking Barriers for Adults Who Engage in Various Types of Walking and Those Who Do Not

Type of Walking Walking Barriersb

Footwear Situational Appearance

Mean (SD) P  Mean (SD) P Mean (SD) P
Stairs instead of elevator
 Yes  1.7 (0.8)  .28 2.2 (0.7)  .04 1.8 (0.8) .03 
  No  1.9 (0.8)  2.5 (0.7) 2.1 (0.0)
Walk instead of drive
  Yes  1.7 (0.8)  .48  2.2 (0.7)  .21 1.7 (0.8) .01
   No  1.8 (0.8)  2.4 (0.7) 2.0 (0.8)
Park car away from destination
  Yes  1.8 (0.8)  .60  2.3 (0.7)  .88 1.8 (0.8)  .78
  No  1.8 (0.8)  2.3 (0.7) 1.8 (0.8)
Walk at lunch
  Yes  1.8 (0.7) .90 2.1 (0.8)  .02 1.8 (0.7)  .39
  No  1.8 (0.8) 2.4 (0.7) 1.9 (0.8)
Get off bus early
  Yes  1.8 (0.7)  .93  2.2 (0.8)  .58 2.0 (1.0)  .51
  No  1.8 (0.8)  2.3 (0.7) 1.8 (0.8)
Extra walking
  Yes 1.9 (0.8) .01 2.2 (0.7)  .13 1.9 (0.8)  .64
  No 1.6 (0.7) 2.4 (0.7) 1.8 (0.8)
Walk for transportationc
  Yes  1.7 (0.8)  .87 2.2 (0.7)  .045 1.9 (0.8)  .33
  No  1.8 (0.8)  2.4 (0.7) 1.8 (0.8)
Walk for recreationc
  Yes  1.8 (0.8)  .72  2.4 (0.8) .28  1.7 (0.7) .054
  No  1.7 (0.8)  2.3 (0.7) 1.9 (0.8)
a

Walking barriers were assessed using a 4-point scale, from 1 = not at all to 4 = a great deal; vigorous exercise barriers were assessed using a 5-point scale, from 1 = not at all to 5 = a great deal.

b

P values determined by t tests.

c

Measured by 3-Day Physical Activity Recall.