Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 19;8(4):R41. doi: 10.1186/bcr1512

Table 2.

Demonstration LAD model consisting of nine positive and seven negative patterns on the support set of six genes

Patterns Definition of patterns Patterns' coverages (prevalences) on training set

AF018081 NM_003239 NM_004035 Contig26768_RC Contig15031_RC Contig27639_RC

Attr. 1 Attr. 2 Attr. 3 Attr. 4 Attr. 5 Attr. 6 Positive prevalence Negative prevalence
P1 ≤-0.014 >-0.106 ≤0.055 22 (64.71%) 0
P2 >-0.232, ≤0.0575 >-0.106 >-0.2305 17 (50%) 0
P3 ≤-0.0945 ≤0.0915 >-0.1555 13 (38.24%) 0
P4 >-0.12 >-0.1555, ≤-0.014 ≤0.1145 12 (35.29%) 0
P5 >-0.12, ≤0.0055 ≤0.0575 ≤0.1485 11 (32.35%) 0
P6 >-0.2025 >-0.106, ≤0.0455 >-0.0065, ≤0.055 11 (32.35%) 0
P7 >-0.08 >-0.0345 >-0.1555, ≤0.1445 9 (26.47%) 0
P8 >0.071 >-0.106, ≤0.0775 >-0.1555 9 (26.47%) 0
P9 >-0.319 >0.035 >-0.1555, ≤0.1445 6 (17.65%) 0
N1 ≤0.071 ≤0.098 >0.0915 0 15 (34.09%)
N2 >0.1145 ≤0.037 0 15 (34.09%)
N3 ≤0.071 >0.0575 >-0.0635 0 14 (31.82%)
N4 ≤-0.106 0 13 (29.55%)
N5 >-0.014 ≤-0.1555 0 12 (27.27%)
N6 >-0.1335, ≤0.098 >0.055 ≤0.037 0 11 (25%)
N7 >-0.319 >0.035 >0.055, ≤0.1485 0 7 (15.91%)

LAD, logical analysis of data.