. 2006 Dec 12;7(Suppl 4):S14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S4-S14

Table 9.

Compare our method with 4 current methods

Method	Q₃(%)	Q_H(%)	Q_E(%)	Q_H^PRE(%)	Q_E^PRE(%)	SOV (%)	SOV_H(%)	SOV_E(%)
Our method	56.10^-	72.86*	68.17*	67.17⁺	53.35^-	51.14^-	60.89⁺	57.46⁺
DSC	69.10	63.65	54.95	73.70	71.31	66.19	63.14	60.86
NNSSP	72.31	64.93	55.28	80.42	73.34	67.32	66.07	63.40
PHD	72.60	65.38	68.59	77.98	63.55	69.94	65.74	72.05
PREDATOR	69.58	62.21	54.50	75.33	70.14	64.85	64.23	60.57

Superscript marker with sign '*', '+', '-' means the accuracy of our method was better than, close to, worse than other four methods in these indices, respectively.