Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 12;7(Suppl 4):S10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S4-S10

Table 2.

Comparison of Clustering Results

Data Set BLASTClust BAG SEQOPTICS
S P R S P R S P R

l(Pfam) 0.05 1.00 0.05 0.27 1.00 0.27 0.83 0.99 0.84
2(Pfam) 0.04 1.00 0.04 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.85 0.98 0.87
3(NCBI) 0.11 1.00 0.11 0.60 1.00 0.60 0.66 0.82 0.78
4(Swiss-Prot) 0.06 1.00 0.06 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.81 0.99 0.82

Clustering results of four data sets by three methods according to three parameters: S(Jaccard Coefficient), P(Precision), R(Recall). It shows that SEQOPTICS outperforms BAG and BLASTClust which tend to give more clusters than "true" clusters.