Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb;97(2):337–343. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.076810

TABLE 2—

Participation of Asians and Latinos in Preventive Health Behaviors and Physical Activity, Difference From Whites, and Generation Trends: California Adolescents, California Health Interview Survey, 2001

Used Bicycle Helmeta Always Used Seat Belt Used Sunscreenb Physical Activityc
Unadjusted % Adjusted % Unadjusted % Adjusted % Unadjusted % Adjusted % Unadjusted % Adjusted %
Total 50 80 57 73
White 65 60 82 80 69 66 77 76
Asiand,e,f 56* 53 71*** 71** 57** 56** 66** 67**
    First generationg 45** 45* 58*** 60*** 44*** 48** 57*** 58***
    Second generationg 58 53 75 74 64 60 70 70
    Third generationg 75 69 95 94 70 65 81 80
Latinod,f,h 29*** 36*** 79 83 48*** 57*** 70*** 72
    First generationg 29*** 41*** 82 87* 47*** 60 68** 70
    Second generationg 27*** 34*** 78 82 48*** 58** 69** 72
    Third generationg 34*** 35*** 78 79 49*** 52*** 74 75

Notes. Values are predicted percentages based on logistic regression models. Adjustment was made for gender, age, parent’s education, percentage of federal poverty level, and rural versus urban residence. Levels of missing responses were less than 2% for all outcomes.

aAlways/sometimes. N = 4609.

bAlways/sometimes.

c Moderate activity for 30 minutes or vigorous activity for 20 minutes at least 3 of the past 7 days.

d Test of race/ethnicity versus White.

e Overall F test for generational trend among Asians was significant at P < .05 for physical activity (unadjusted model) and at P < .01 for always using a seat belt (both adjusted and unadjusted models) and using sunscreen (unadjusted model).

f The test of differences between Asians and Latinos overall was significant at P < .05 for using sunscreen (unadjusted model), at P < .01 for always using a seat belt (unadjusted model), and at P < .001 for using a bicycle helmet (both adjusted and unadjusted models) and always using a seatbelt (adjusted model).

g Test of generation versus Whites.

h Overall F test for generational trend among Latinos was not significant for any model.

* P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.