Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul;106(3):373–380. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01444.x

Table 3. Comparison of observed and expected frequencies of various combination of DL and DS receptors.

3DL1 3DS1 2DL1 2DS1 2DL2 2DS2 2DL4
Frequency 0·579 0·316 0·684 0·447 0·368 0·263 0·684
3DL1 o -
e -
3DS1 o 0·237 -
e 0·182 -
2DL1 o 0·396 0·184 -
e 0·395 0·216 -
2DS1 o 0·266 0·053 0·394 -
e 0·258 0·141 0·305 -
2DL2 o 0·184 0·105 0·184 0·052 -
e 0·213 0·116 0·251 0·164 -
2DS2 o 0·131 0·105 0·131 0·026 0·236 -
e 0·152 0·083 0·179 0·117 0·096 -
2DL4 o 0·368 0·210 0·421 0·289 0·263 0·157 -
e 0·396 0·216 0·468 0·305 0·251 0·179 -

o=observed frequency, e=expected frequency.

Number in bold represents <0·005 significance.