Table 2.
cjTREC levels in the sorted T cells of DP-High and DP-Low group
cjTRECs (copies/105 T cells) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | No. | % of DP T cells in the PBL | % of naive subset in the sorted T cellsA | Number of copiesB | Mean ±SD | The mean copy number of cjTRECs in each naive T cells† |
DP-High | 2 | 17.23 | 6.33 | 2 778 | 4 362 ± 3 139* | 0.439 |
9 | 14.10 | 8.15 | 2 330 | 0.286 | ||
12 | 10.10 | 12.33 | 7 978 | 0.647 | ||
DP-Low | 3 | 3.10 | 16.38 | 17 098 | 22 722 ± 4 928 | 1.044 |
5 | 0.70 | 23.06 | 26 283 | 1.140 | ||
6 | 1.22 | 19.70 | 24 785 | 1.258 |
The T cells were sorted out by deletion of CD14+, CD16+, and CD20+ lymphocytes from the PBMC. Sorted T cells (1×106) were used for preparation of genomic DNA and a part of them was stained with CD45RA-FITC and CD62L-PE. The naive T cell subset was defined by CD45RA+CD62L+ phenotype.
Indicates significant difference (P < 0.006) in TREC levels between DP-High and DP-Low group (Student's t test).
Firstly, the number of naive subset in the 105 T cells was calculated by the percentageA of naive subset in the sorted T cells and then this number was compared with cjTREC levelsB in the 105 T cells measured in this study. If all naive T cells in the periphery are RTE, this value can be maximally calculated at approximately 1.26 [20].