Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun;109(2):217–225. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01646.x

Table 2.

cjTREC levels in the sorted T cells of DP-High and DP-Low group

cjTRECs (copies/105 T cells)

Group No. % of DP T cells in the PBL % of naive subset in the sorted T cellsA Number of copiesB Mean ±SD The mean copy number of cjTRECs in each naive T cells
DP-High 2 17.23 6.33 2 778 4 362 ± 3 139* 0.439
9 14.10 8.15 2 330 0.286
12 10.10 12.33 7 978 0.647
DP-Low 3 3.10 16.38 17 098 22 722 ± 4 928 1.044
5 0.70 23.06 26 283 1.140
6 1.22 19.70 24 785 1.258

The T cells were sorted out by deletion of CD14+, CD16+, and CD20+ lymphocytes from the PBMC. Sorted T cells (1×106) were used for preparation of genomic DNA and a part of them was stained with CD45RA-FITC and CD62L-PE. The naive T cell subset was defined by CD45RA+CD62L+ phenotype.

*

Indicates significant difference (P < 0.006) in TREC levels between DP-High and DP-Low group (Student's t test).

Firstly, the number of naive subset in the 105 T cells was calculated by the percentageA of naive subset in the sorted T cells and then this number was compared with cjTREC levelsB in the 105 T cells measured in this study. If all naive T cells in the periphery are RTE, this value can be maximally calculated at approximately 1.26 [20].