Skip to main content
. 2003 Nov;110(3):368–375. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2003.01748.x

Table 6.

Fertility studies of three strains of mice

Mouse strain Group No. mice with bilateral fertility/total mice (%) Mean ± 1 SD no. embryos per mouse per uterine horn

Right* Left
C3H/HeN Immunized, challenged 17/17 (100) 3·5 ± 2·0 2·9 ± 1·5
Sham immunized, challenged 0/14 (0) 0·9 ± 2·4§ 0·1 ± 0·3§
Sham immunized, non-challenged 17/19 (89·5) 3·2 ± 1·9 3·4 ± 1·1
C57BL/6 Immunized, challenged 15/18 (83·3) 3·7 ± 2·4 3·2 ± 2·3
Sham immunized, challenged 3/18 (16·7) 2·4 ± 3·0 0·2 ± 0·4§
Sham immunized, non-challenged 9/11 (81·8) 3·8 ± 2·6 3·8 ± 1·9
BALB/c Immunized, challenged 16/16 (100) 4·4 ± 2·0 3·4 ± 1·5
Sham immunized, challenged 3/20 (15) 3·1 ± 3·1 0·6 ± 0·6§
Sham immunized, non-challenged 20/21 (95·2) 4·1 ± 2·0 3·0 ± 1·7
*

Inoculated with HeLa cell extracts.

Inoculated with 105 IFU of C. trachomatis MoPn.

P < 0·05 by Fisher's exact test compared to the sham immunized, non-challenged mice.

§

P < 0·05 by Student's t-test compared to the sham immunized, non-challenged mice.