Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Nov;84(5):1215–1223. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.5.1215

TABLE 4.

Energy density of self-reported dietary components in a 24-h recall from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I to NHANES 1999–20021

Energy density NHANES I NHANES II NHANES III NHANES 1999–2002 P for trend
All foods and beverages (kcal/g)2
 All 0.90 ± 0.006 0.89 ± 0.007 0.90 ± 0.005 0.91 ± 0.01 0.15
 Men 0.95 ± 0.008 0.94 ± 0.007 0.93 ± 0.007 0.93 ± 0.01 0.04
 Women 0.84 ± 0.007 0.84 ± 0.008 0.88 ± 0.006 0.90 ± 0.01 < 0.0001
All foods and nutritive beverages (kcal/g)
 All 1.60 ± 0.01 1.61 ± 0.01 1.67 ± 0.01 1.69 ± 0.02 < 0.0001
 Men 1.65 ± 0.01 1.68 ± 0.01 1.72 ± 0.01 1.74 ± 0.02
 Women 1.54 ± 0.01 1.55 ± 0.04 1.62 ± 0.01 1.65 ± 0.02
All foods and beverages reported as snacks (kcal/g)3
 All 0.89 ± 0.02 0.89 ± 0.02 1.02 ± 0.02 1.32 ± 0.03 < 0.0001
 Men 0.85 ± 0.02 0.86 ± 0.02 0.96 ± 0.02 1.28 ± 0.03
 Women 0.94 ± 0.02 0.92 ± 0.02 1.08 ± 0.03 1.37 ± 0.03
All foods and beverages reported as breakfast (kcal/g)2,4
 All 0.75 ± 0.01 0.78 ± 0.01 0.83 ± 0.01 0.97 ± 0.02 < 0.0001
 Men 0.84 ± 0.01 0.86 ± 0.01 0.86 ± 0.01 0.97 ± 0.02 < 0.0001
 Women 0.68 ± 0.01 0.71 ± 0.01 0.81 ± 0.02 0.97 ± 0.02 < 0.0001
All foods and beverages reported in the evening (kcal/g)2,5
 All 1.10 ± 0.01 1.11 ± 0.01 1.11 ± 0.01 1.22 ± 0.01 < 0.0001
 Men 1.12 ± 0.01 1.15 ± 0.01 1.12 ± 0.01 1.22 ± 0.01 0.0001
 Women 1.08 ± 0.01 1.08 ± 0.01 1.11 ± 0.01 1.23 ± 0.02 < 0.0001
1

Estimates were derived from regression models with each variable in the table as a continuous outcome; independent variables were sex (in models for all), age, age2, race (white, black, other), education (<12 y, 12 y, >12 y), smoking status (never, former, current), any weekly leisure-time physical activity (yes, no), self-reported chronic diseases (diabetes, heart disease, hypertension) (yes, no), BMI (continuous), and survey (NHANES I, NHANES II, NHANES III, NHANES 1999–2002) as trend. The estimates are adjusted x¯±SE from weighted regression models that included respondents with complete covariate information (total n = 37 530; 17 173 men and 20 357 women).

2

Interaction of sex by survey was significant, P < 0.05. Sex-specific P values are not given for variables for which the sex-by-survey interaction was not significant.

3

Limited to those with complete covariate information among snack reporters (total n = 31869; 14 540 men and 17 329 women).

4

Limited to those with complete covariate information among breakfast reporters (n = 31 714 all; 14 307 men; 17 407 women).

5

Limited to those with complete covariate information among evening food intake reporters (total n = 36 107 all; 16 490 men and 19 617 women).