Table 4.
Stomach | Liver | Lung | |
gen | M/F | M/F | M/F |
φmb | 11.89 | 36.90 | 13.60 |
Dφ > 0 | 1311 | 231 | 506 |
T1c | 505007.81 | 104710.40 | 452429.89 |
T2 | 433148.43 | 100577.71 | 389939.77 |
T3 | 453123.28 | 97629.42 | 408114.01 |
LRTcat-cond | 21.59 | 33.84 | 19.30 |
β1e | 0.48 (0.21, 0.81) | 1.30 (0.68, 2.15) | 0.96 (0.17, 2.46) |
β2 | 0.16 (-0.08, 0.46) | 0.85 (0.25, 1.75) | 1.84 (0.66, 4.08) |
β3 | 0.42 (0.16, 0.75) | 1.39 (0.70, 2.34) | 1.33 (0.38, 3.11) |
Dev | 1661.13 | 1235.38 | 1035.39 |
Chi-sq | 3391.69 | 2451.56 | 3111.30 |
df | 2990 | 2990 | 2990 |
Colon | Uterus | All solid | |
gen | M/F | F | M/F |
φmb | 20.28 | 26.91 | 43.86 |
Dφ > 0 | 184 | 127 | 365 |
T1c | 342887.98 | 128431.04 | 24656.43 |
T2 | 288767.71 | 153667.68 | 21860.18 |
T3 | 307331.28 | 145793.72 | 21917.87 |
LRTcat-cond | 1.57 | 8.08 | 16.31 |
β1e | 0.07 (-0.40, 0.95) | 0.92 (0.19, 2.08) | 0.13 (-0.06, 0.34) |
β2 | 0.32 (-0.31, 1.52) | 0.28 (-0.30, 1.29) | 0.43 (0.16, 0.74) |
β3 | 0.02 (-0.44, 0.89) | 0.52 (-0.08, 1.48) | 0.29 (0.06, 0.56) |
Dev | 718.42 | 630.89 | 2121.74 |
Chi-sq | 3625.26 | 1038.26 | 2772.40 |
df | 2990 | 1511 | 2990 |
a 0 – 20 mSv subcohort, Excess Relative Risk ERR = β1dosecat1 + β2dosecat2 + β3dosecat3 with βi constrained by 1 + βi ≥ 0; dosecat1 = 1 if 0 < Dφ ≤ 0.025, and = 0 otherwise; dosecat2 = 1 if 0.025 < Dφ ≤ 0.05, and = 0 otherwise; dosecat3 = 1 if 0.05 < Dφ, and = 0 otherwise. The Control model is nested by β1 = β2 = β3 = 0.
b Latency φm is chosen from the results of the two-phase model (Table 3)
c At φm, Tj is the p-y observation for which dosecatj = 1, j = 1,2,3
d At φm, the likelihood ratio test LRTcat-con compares the category model with the control model (χ2 on 3 df)
e At φm, βi are the fitted Maximum Likelihood Estimate parameter values, with 95%CI's
Other definitions as in Table 3.