Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 18;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-1

Table 6.

Two-phase and linear models fittted to subsets of the liver dataa

i Rib p-y in Sic Casesd LRTe ERR1f
1 0 – 0.01552 1522195.93 441 22.00 1.67
2 0.015521 – 0.019389 1520822.41 459 18.94 1.28
3 0.19396 – 0.022682 1521452.84 499 27.01 1.49
4 0.022687 – 0.025616 1521872.88 500 30.31 1.57
5 0.025619 – 0.30046 1521932.58 510 28.61 1.42
6 0.030066 – 0.037161 1522215.36 494 26.14 1.37
7 0.037211 – 0.87187 1521303.24 483 26.31 1.50
8 0.87209 – 0.97152 1521034.77 492 30.44 1.36
9 0.97154 – 1.0107 1521559.95 507 28.56 1.74
10 1.0108 – 2.000 1519135.79 475 26.42 1.21

a The two-phase and linear models are fitted to subsets of the 0 – 20 mSv liver data with latency φ = 36.90 years (optimal for the two-phase model on the 0 – 20 mSv data, see Table 3)

b Ri is the excluded dose range (in 10 mSv units). Si consists of those cells in the 0 – 20 mSv subcohort whose weighted adjusted colon dose does not fall in Ri

c Person-years in Si

d Cases (liver cancer deaths) in Si

e LRT = LRT2p-lin for comparing the two-phase model with the linear model when fitted to Si with latency φ = 36.90 years

f ERR1 is the estimated Excess Relative Risk at 10 mSv when the two-phase model with latency φ = 36.90 years is fitted to Si