Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1996 Dec;178(23):6658–6664. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.23.6658-6664.1996

Competition between functional signal peptides demonstrates variation in affinity for the secretion pathway.

H Chen 1, J Kim 1, D A Kendall 1
PMCID: PMC178558  PMID: 8955279

Abstract

We have developed a system for examining the relative affinity of two different signal peptides for the protein secretion pathway in Escherichia coli. This system involves the expression of a modified alkaline phosphatase which possesses two signal peptides arranged in tandem. When both signal peptides have the wild-type sequence, cleavage after the first and cleavage after the second occur with nearly equal frequency. In both cases the remainder of the protein is transported to the periplasm. Thus both signal peptides effectively compete with each other for entrance to the secretion pathway. When the hydrophobicity of the second signal peptide is altered by small increments, we find that the more hydrophobic signal peptide is preferentially utilized. Thus, a more hydrophobic signal peptide can outcompete even an efficient wild-type signal sequence. The crossover point, for utilization of the second to the first signal peptide, is marked and occurs over a very small change in hydrophobicity. Our results suggest that the small differences in the hydrophobicity of wild-type signal peptides may have critical consequences: preproteins with the more hydrophobic signals could dominate one pathway, leaving those with only slightly less hydrophobic signals to require additional factors such as chaperonins, SecB, and other binding proteins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (324.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akimaru J., Matsuyama S., Tokuda H., Mizushima S. Reconstitution of a protein translocation system containing purified SecY, SecE, and SecA from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 1;88(15):6545–6549. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akita M., Sasaki S., Matsuyama S., Mizushima S. SecA interacts with secretory proteins by recognizing the positive charge at the amino terminus of the signal peptide in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1990 May 15;265(14):8164–8169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akiyama Y., Ito K. Export of Escherichia coli alkaline phosphatase attached to an integral membrane protein, SecY. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jan 5;264(1):437–442. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Audigier Y., Friedlander M., Blobel G. Multiple topogenic sequences in bovine opsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(16):5783–5787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.16.5783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blobel G., Sabatini D. D. Controlled proteolysis of nascent polypeptides in rat liver cell fractions. I. Location of the polypeptides within ribosomes. J Cell Biol. 1970 Apr;45(1):130–145. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.1.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brundage L., Hendrick J. P., Schiebel E., Driessen A. J., Wickner W. The purified E. coli integral membrane protein SecY/E is sufficient for reconstitution of SecA-dependent precursor protein translocation. Cell. 1990 Aug 24;62(4):649–657. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90111-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen H., Kendall D. A. Artificial transmembrane segments. Requirements for stop transfer and polypeptide orientation. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jun 9;270(23):14115–14122. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.23.14115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chou M. M., Kendall D. A. Polymeric sequences reveal a functional interrelationship between hydrophobicity and length of signal peptides. J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 15;265(5):2873–2880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coleman J., Inukai M., Inouye M. Dual functions of the signal peptide in protein transfer across the membrane. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):351–360. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90040-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Derman A. I., Puziss J. W., Bassford P. J., Jr, Beckwith J. A signal sequence is not required for protein export in prlA mutants of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1993 Mar;12(3):879–888. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05728.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doud S. K., Chou M. M., Kendall D. A. Titration of protein transport activity by incremental changes in signal peptide hydrophobicity. Biochemistry. 1993 Feb 9;32(5):1251–1256. doi: 10.1021/bi00056a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Economou A., Wickner W. SecA promotes preprotein translocation by undergoing ATP-driven cycles of membrane insertion and deinsertion. Cell. 1994 Sep 9;78(5):835–843. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(94)90582-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans E. A., Gilmore R., Blobel G. Purification of microsomal signal peptidase as a complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(3):581–585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.3.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hann B. C., Walter P. The signal recognition particle in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Oct 4;67(1):131–144. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90577-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hardy S. J., Randall L. L. A kinetic partitioning model of selective binding of nonnative proteins by the bacterial chaperone SecB. Science. 1991 Jan 25;251(4992):439–443. doi: 10.1126/science.1989077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Izard J. W., Kendall D. A. Signal peptides: exquisitely designed transport promoters. Mol Microbiol. 1994 Sep;13(5):765–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00469.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jungnickel B., Rapoport T. A. A posttargeting signal sequence recognition event in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):261–270. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90313-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kendall D. A., Bock S. C., Kaiser E. T. Idealization of the hydrophobic segment of the alkaline phosphatase signal peptide. Nature. 1986 Jun 12;321(6071):706–708. doi: 10.1038/321706a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kendall D. A., Kaiser E. T. A functional decaisoleucine-containing signal sequence. Construction by cassette mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 1988 May 25;263(15):7261–7265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim Y. J., Rajapandi T., Oliver D. SecA protein is exposed to the periplasmic surface of the E. coli inner membrane in its active state. Cell. 1994 Sep 9;78(5):845–853. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(94)90602-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumamoto C. A., Beckwith J. Evidence for specificity at an early step in protein export in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1985 Jul;163(1):267–274. doi: 10.1128/jb.163.1.267-274.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumamoto C. A. Molecular chaperones and protein translocation across the Escherichia coli inner membrane. Mol Microbiol. 1991 Jan;5(1):19–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kyte J., Doolittle R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 5;157(1):105–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Laforet G. A., Kendall D. A. Functional limits of conformation, hydrophobicity, and steric constraints in prokaryotic signal peptide cleavage regions. Wild type transport by a simple polymeric signal sequence. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 15;266(2):1326–1334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Luirink J., Dobberstein B. Mammalian and Escherichia coli signal recognition particles. Mol Microbiol. 1994 Jan;11(1):9–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Luirink J., High S., Wood H., Giner A., Tollervey D., Dobberstein B. Signal-sequence recognition by an Escherichia coli ribonucleoprotein complex. Nature. 1992 Oct 22;359(6397):741–743. doi: 10.1038/359741a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Malkin L. I., Rich A. Partial resistance of nascent polypeptide chains to proteolytic digestion due to ribosomal shielding. J Mol Biol. 1967 Jun 14;26(2):329–346. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90301-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Matsuyama S., Fujita Y., Mizushima S. SecD is involved in the release of translocated secretory proteins from the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1993 Jan;12(1):265–270. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05652.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ng D. T., Brown J. D., Walter P. Signal sequences specify the targeting route to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Cell Biol. 1996 Jul;134(2):269–278. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.2.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nishiyama K., Suzuki T., Tokuda H. Inversion of the membrane topology of SecG coupled with SecA-dependent preprotein translocation. Cell. 1996 Apr 5;85(1):71–81. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81083-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Oliver D. B., Cabelli R. J., Dolan K. M., Jarosik G. P. Azide-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli alter the SecA protein, an azide-sensitive component of the protein export machinery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov;87(21):8227–8231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Patel S., Austen B. M. Substitution of fifty four homologue (Ffh) in Escherichia coli with the mammalian 54-kDa protein of signal-recognition particle. Eur J Biochem. 1996 Jun 15;238(3):760–768. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0760w.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Phillips G. J., Silhavy T. J. The E. coli ffh gene is necessary for viability and efficient protein export. Nature. 1992 Oct 22;359(6397):744–746. doi: 10.1038/359744a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Phoenix D. A., Kusters R., Hikita C., Mizushima S., de Kruijff B. OmpF-Lpp signal sequence mutants with varying charge hydrophobicity ratios provide evidence for a phosphatidylglycerol-signal sequence interaction during protein translocation across the Escherichia coli inner membrane. J Biol Chem. 1993 Aug 15;268(23):17069–17073. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rusch S. L., Chen H., Izard J. W., Kendall D. A. Signal peptide hydrophobicity is finely tailored for function. J Cell Biochem. 1994 Jun;55(2):209–217. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240550208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Russel M., Model P. Filamentous phage pre-coat is an integral membrane protein: analysis by a new method of membrane preparation. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):177–184. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90387-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sakaguchi M., Tomiyoshi R., Kuroiwa T., Mihara K., Omura T. Functions of signal and signal-anchor sequences are determined by the balance between the hydrophobic segment and the N-terminal charge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):16–19. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Talmadge K., Stahl S., Gilbert W. Eukaryotic signal sequence transports insulin antigen in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jun;77(6):3369–3373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thom J. R., Randall L. L. Role of the leader peptide of maltose-binding protein in two steps of the export process. J Bacteriol. 1988 Dec;170(12):5654–5661. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.12.5654-5661.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ulbrandt N. D., London E., Oliver D. B. Deep penetration of a portion of Escherichia coli SecA protein into model membranes is promoted by anionic phospholipids and by partial unfolding. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jul 25;267(21):15184–15192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Valent Q. A., Kendall D. A., High S., Kusters R., Oudega B., Luirink J. Early events in preprotein recognition in E. coli: interaction of SRP and trigger factor with nascent polypeptides. EMBO J. 1995 Nov 15;14(22):5494–5505. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00236.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Walter P., Johnson A. E. Signal sequence recognition and protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1994;10:87–119. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.10.110194.000511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Watanabe M., Blobel G. High-affinity binding of Escherichia coli SecB to the signal sequence region of a presecretory protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Oct 24;92(22):10133–10136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wickner W., Moore K., Dibb N., Geissert D., Rice M. Inhibition of purified Escherichia coli leader peptidase by the leader (signal) peptide of bacteriophage M13 procoat. J Bacteriol. 1987 Aug;169(8):3821–3822. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.8.3821-3822.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. von Heijne G., Gavel Y. Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1988 Jul 1;174(4):671–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES