Skip to main content
PMC home page
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 1992 Feb;67(2):196–200. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.2.196

Prospective evaluation of the Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score.

G Balakrishnan 1, T Aitchison 1, D Hallworth 1, N S Morton 1
PMCID: PMC1793408  PMID: 1543378

Abstract

The performance of the admission day Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score for outcome prediction was assessed prospectively in 270 consecutive admissions, aged 3 days to 18.6 years, to a paediatric intensive care unit. Using a cut off of r = 0.00 (expected mortality = 50%), the overall sensitivity (correct prediction of death) was 48% while specificity (correct prediction of survival) was 99%, comparable with the original validation data of the score in the USA. Outcome prediction was most accurate when the stay in the paediatric intensive care unit was between one and four days. Sensitivity was appreciably lower for operative patients (17%) compared with non-operative patients (71%) because of a failure to predict deaths after cardiac surgery. The sensitivity (41%) and specificity (99%) using five variables (systolic blood pressure, Glasgow coma scale, carbon dioxide tension, and serum bicarbonate and serum calcium concentrations) was similar to that using all 14 variables. Six variable ranges related differently with non-survival compared with the score. It is concluded that the performance of the PRISM score is institution independent and good for short stay patients. It underpredicts deaths after cardiac surgery. Only five variables may be needed for satisfactory outcome prediction. Some of the variables need reweighting for paediatric intensive care units in the UK.

Full text

PDF
196

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chang R. W. Individual outcome prediction models for intensive care units. Lancet. 1989 Jul 15;2(8655):143–146. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90193-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Civetta J. M. The inverse relationship between cost and survival. J Surg Res. 1973 Mar;14(3):265–269. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(73)90144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cullen D. J., Civetta J. M., Briggs B. A., Ferrara L. C. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med. 1974 Mar-Apr;2(2):57–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Klem S. A., Pollack M. M., Glass N. L., Spohn W. A., Kanter R. K., Zucker A. R., Ruttimann U. E. Resource use, efficiency, and outcome prediction in pediatric intensive care of trauma patients. J Trauma. 1990 Jan;30(1):32–36. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199001000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pollack M. M., Ruttimann U. E., Getson P. R. Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med. 1988 Nov;16(11):1110–1116. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198811000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ruttimann U. E., Albert A., Pollack M. M., Glass N. L. Dynamic assessment of severity of illness in pediatric intensive care. Crit Care Med. 1986 Mar;14(3):215–221. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198603000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yeh T. S., Pollack M. M., Ruttimann U. E., Holbrook P. R., Fields A. I. Validation of a physiologic stability index for use in critically ill infants and children. Pediatr Res. 1984 May;18(5):445–451. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198405000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zobel G., Kuttnig M., Grubbauer H. M., Rödl S. Evaluation of clinical scoring systems in critically ill infants and children. Clin Intensive Care. 1990;1(5):202–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES