Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 13;51(2):732–735. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00690-06

TABLE 2.

Comparison between groups of samples containing I84C, I84A, and I84V with similar backgroundsa

Genotype at position:
Nb Median (range) FC in resistance
RC (Nc) Median RC (%)
46 54 84 APV IDV LPV NFV RTV SQV
M I V 100 4.0 (1-400) 2.4 (1-30) 2.8 (1-174) 4.0 (0.3-228) 6.7 (2-400) 4.3 (1-1,000) 70 53
M I C 5 8.6 (2-53) 4.1 (1-6) 2.2 (0.4-5) 74 (15-286) 10 (2-29) 56 (6-242) 5 12
I I V 81 9.0 (1-91) 9.1 (1-78) 8.9 (1-162) 9.0 (1-119) 11 (2-82) 4.3 (1-110) 56 33
I I A 10 33 (21-252) 73 (27-400) 14 (9-94) >600d (64-600) 74 (34-167) 261 (24-1,000) 9 18
IL I C 6 21 (10-64) 8.6 (4-63) 3.1 (2-47) 115 (51-600) 18 (9-60) 80 (24-1,000) 5 13
I V V 51 36 (1-400) 19 (1-400) 80 (8-500) 16 (2-129) 49 (18-400) 20 (1-1,000) 38 27
I MV A 5 74 (30-400) 178 (92-400) 75 (50-211) >600d (64-600) >400d (141-400) >1,000d 4 19
a

Samples containing I84A, I84C, or I84V and the indicated changes at position 46 or 54 but no mutation at positions 30, 32, 48, 50, 82 (except 82I), and 90.

b

N, number of samples defined by mutation listed.

c

N, number of RC data.

d

The median FC for these groups was over the maximum measurable level of resistance; N, number of samples.