Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug;65(8):1074–1079. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.048835

Table 5 Sensitivity of fracture incidence rate ratio* estimates to more restrictive assessments of arthritis diagnoses.

Age category (years) During UTS† Two diagnoses‡ NSAIDs prescribed
(n = 844) (n = 381) (n = 1047)
<10 1.84 (1.09 to 2.93) 0.98 (0.20 to 2.86) 1.34 (0.58 to 2.65)
10–15 2.86 (1.79 to 4.36) 2.29 (0.99 to 4.54) 2.54 (1.55 to 3.94)
15–20 1.86 (1.06 to 3.02) 1.32 (0.43 to 3.10) 1.66 (1.02 to 2.55)
20–45 1.03 (0.28 to 2.64) 1.40 (0.77 to 2.36)
>45 5.56 (1.79 to 13.17) 3.60 (1.63 to 6.95)
Test for heterogeneity p>0.2 p = 0.04 p = 0.09
Combined estimate§ 2.15 (1.65 to 2.80)

*IRR (95% confidence interval); †subjects ⩾20 years at the start of follow up were not analysed because of the small number of subjects with arthritis (n = 10, no fractures); ‡more than 6 weeks apart; §the Mantel‐Haenszel combined estimate is provided when there is homogeneity across age category strata.