Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul 31;66(2):215–221. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.054478

Table 2 Mean cost (€) and effect differences between treatment groups and cost‐effectiveness ratios for all patients (missing data imputed).

Effect measure Behavioural graded activity—usual care
Cost difference* Effect difference* ICER (95% CI)
QALYs (EuroQol; n = 87/92) −1028 −0.02 51385 (− 104674 to 1663872)
WOMAC pain (scale 0–20; n = 83/91) −942 0.60 −1575 (−103391 to 3854)
WOMAC physical (scale 0–68; n = 77/89) −813 −0.17 4701 (484 to 299159
VAS pain now (scale 0–10; n = 84/91) −952 0.27 −3476 (−652950 to 869)
VAS pain past week (scale 0–10; n = 84/89) −1016 0.13 −7699 (−8101771 to −1865)
PGA (% improved; n = 83/87) −1005 6.5 −15462 (−4732743 to 9039)†
Responders OARSI criteria (%; n = 90/100) −773 6.5 −11886 (−1484690 to 697)†

ICER, Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio; OARSI, Osteoarthritis Research Society International; PGA, Patient Global Assessment Scale; QALY, quality‐adjusted life years; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities.

*Cost and effect difference corrected for clustering within the factor physiotherapist.

†Incremental cost per patient improved/responder.