Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Feb 3.

Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2006 Dec 13;1131(1):197–210. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.082

Table 4.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MEAN AND S.D.s FOR REGIONAL CALLOSAL AREA AND BENDING ANGLE AND UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE

	Current Study				Antshel et al. (2005)

Variable	DS	TD	F(1,32)^a	P	DS	TD	F(1,110)	P
Genu	2.25 (0.6)^b 31.9%^c	1.93 (0.2) 29.5%	4.07	0.052	1.7 (0.3) 21.8%	1.7 (0.2) 25.0%	1.3	0.254
Anterior body	0.98 (0.3) 13.9%	0.99 (0.1) 15.2%	0.02	0.882	1.5 (0.2) 19.2%	1.3 (0.2) 19.1%	22.2	0.001
Mid-body	0.90 (0.2) 12.7%	0.88 (0.1) 13.5%	0.06	0.805	1.4 (0.2) 17.9%	1.2 (0.2) 17.6%	21.3	0.001
Isthmus	0.95 (0.3) 13.5%	0.88 (0.1) 13.5%	0.68	0.416	1.3 (0.2) 16.7%	1.0 (0.2) 14.7%	32.7	0.001
Splenium	1.94 (0.5) 27.5%	1.82 (0.2) 27.8%	1.09	0.305	2.0 (0.4) 25.6%	1.7 (0.3) 25.0%	25.7	0.001
Total area	7.1 (1.8)	6.5 (0.5)	1.40	0.246	7.8 (1.2)	6.8 (0.9)	24.5	0.001
Bending angle	92.5 (8.8)^d	103.4(8.7)	23.13	0.001	94.3 (10.6)	106.3 (10.1)	37.3	0.001

^a

ANOVA, F-test scores.

^b

Mean (S.D.) area in cm².

^c

Percentage of total area.

^d

Mean (S.D.) bending angle in degrees.

Note: DS=deleted group, TD=typically developing controls.