Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 18;51(3):902–911. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00833-06

TABLE 1.

LVD-refractory patients analyzed for resistance

Patient populationa No. (%) of patients
Study 015/901 Study 014/901 Study 026/901 Total
LVD refractory at baseline 9 181 276 466
    Evidence of LVDr and ETVr 1 8 18 27 (6)
Treatment with 1.0 mg ETV
    Yr 1 monitored 9 40 138 187
    Yr 1 rebounds 0 0 5 5
    Rebounds with preexisting LVDr and ETVr 0 0 0 0
    Rebounds with emerging LVDr and ETVr 0 0 2 2 (1)b
    Total rebounds with LVDr and ETVr 0 0 2 2 (1)
    Emerging LVDr and ETVr without rebound 1 0 8 9 (5)
    Biochemical failuresc 0 0 0 0
    Yr 2 monitored 9 25 117 151
    Yr 2 rebounds 2 2 17 21
    Rebounds with preexisting LVDr and ETVr 2 0 6 8 (5)
    Rebounds with emerging LVDr and ETVr 0 1 5 6 (4)
    Total rebounds with LVDr and ETVr 2 1 11 14 (9)
    Emerging LVDr and ETVr without rebound 1 0 5 6 (4)
    Biochemical failuresc 0 0 0 0
a

The baseline includes all LVD-refractory patients, irrespective of treatment, including LVD and ETV at 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg for study 014 (4); ETV and LVD for study 026; and ETV for study 015. The patients monitored during treatment included those with an HBV DNA measurement beyond week 24 for year 1 and within the second year for year 2. Data were collected in the windowed time point indicated or for the sample obtained at the end of dosing. Year 2 data from rollover study 901 were included if treatment gaps did not exceed 5 weeks.

b

Patients with isolates with a substitution at T184, S202, or M250. The frequency is the number of patients infected with isolates with sequence changes divided by the number of patients monitored.

c

Biochemical failure, alanine aminotransferase levels 10 times the upper limit of normal or 2 times the reference level (at the baseline or the end of treatment).