Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 18;51(3):902–911. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00833-06

TABLE 3.

Novel substitutions emerging during HBV therapy

Substitution Backgrounda Frequencyb ETV EC50 (nM [SD])c
A200V WT 1 7.6 (3.4)
A200V M204I 1 33.0 (27.4)
A200V L180M, M204I 1 10.2 (2.8)
L80V L180M, M204V 2 11.0 (7.1)
V27A L180M, M204V 1 NRd
I53F V173F, L180M, M204V 1 22.3 (11.8)
S78T WT 1 2.4 (1.2)
L80I L180M, M204I 1 45.3 (20.5)
K168E M204I 1 NR
A181T V173L, L180M, M204V 1 14.2 (7.5)
C188S L80I, L180T, M204V 1 31.2 (20.8)
V191Ae 1
V224A V173L, L180M, M204V 1 NR
L228P M204I 1 NR
L229W L180M, M204V 1 32.9 (4.7)
D263G WT 1 5.8 (1.7)
Q267Stop L180M, M204V 1 NR
G295S L80I, M204I 1 NR
M309L WT 1 4.0 (0.4)
a

Background resistance-encoding substitutions in the isolates tested.

b

Frequency indicates the number of patients in whose isolates the substitution emerged.

c

EC50s (standard deviation) are the averages of three or more tests (only two tests for S78T; A200V, M204I, and L180M; and M309L). Substitutions were tested in the background (WT or LVDr) in which they arose. Parallel assays with either WT or LVDr (with the M204V and L180M or M204I substitution) reference clones yielded ETV EC50s of 5.5 nM and 45 nM, respectively.

d

NR, no replication (HBV replication was <10% of that for the WT) and unable to measure the phenotype.

e

V191A was not found in 24 cloned isolates from the patient, and therefore, the isolates were not tested.