Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar;97(3):470–477. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.071936

TABLE 3—

Network Metrics (Reach, Degree, Betweenness) for TB Patients and Their Unevaluated Contacts: Southwest Oklahoma, July 2001 to November 2002

Reach Degree Betweenness
Score Rank Nodea Score Nodea Score Nodea Score
Highest 20 Scores
1 1 0.830 1 0.385 1 0.849
2 1135 0.538 8 0.253 8 0.289
3 1268 0.538 14 0.110 12 0.208
4 1777 0.538 33 0.099 2 0.187
5 1793 0.538 19 0.071 14 0.179
6 1797 0.538 18 0.066 1833 0.179
7 1799 0.538 22 0.060 33 0.128
8 1800 0.538 29 0.038 19 0.118
9 1813 0.538 35 0.038 5 0.104
10 1861 0.538 12 0.033 17 0.095
11 1868 0.538 13 0.027 2034 0.064
12 1869 0.538 17 0.022 18 0.062
13 1889 0.538 21 0.022 35 0.054
14 1905 0.538 3 0.016 1239 0.043
15 1910 0.538 1135 0.016 13 0.033
16 1924 0.538 1268 0.011 22 0.033
17 1925 0.538 1777 0.011 29 0.018
18 1929 0.538 1793 0.011 30 0.011
19 8 0.538 1797 0.011 6 0.011
20 2 0.516 1799 0.011 7 0.011
Lowest 5 Scores
5 1935 0.022 25 0.005 3 0.000
4 25 0.022 34 0.005 34 0.000
3 1253 0.011 37 0.005 37 0.000
2 15 0.011 4 0.005 4 0.000
1 1854 0.011 9 0.005 9 0.000

Note. TB = tuberculosis. The network metrics in this table quantify the visual information of Figure 3 and were used to develop and identify the cases and contacts identified as high priorities on the basis of high scores for reach, degree, and betweenness. For example, nodes 1833, 2034, and 1239 (surrounded by dashed-line boxes in Figure 3) were identified as important contacts for screening and evaluation because of their high betweenness scores in this table.

aNodes numbered between 1 and 35 represent TB patients; nodes with numbers greater than 1000 represent named contacts.