Table 7.
Study | Design | Characteristics of the sample | Major findings |
Lee et al. (2001) | • Prospective 12 months assessment of QOL (Functional Assessment of cancer therapy – Prostate) after surgery, radiotherapy or brachytherapy | • Patients with localized disease: 23 treated with surgery, 23 with radiotherapy and 44 with brachytherapy | • After one month, virtually no change in emotional well being in all 3 groups • After 12 months, emotional well being similar to baseline in all 3 groups |
Fossa et al. (2001) | • Prospective assessment of QOL (EORTC) at 6 weekly intervals until death | • 101 men treated with steroids, 100 with hormone therapy – all showing hormone-resistant metastatic PCA | • Men on steroids have better role functioning and less fatigue, especially between weeks 3 and 12. • Because of attrition thereafter, comparisons between the two groups not possible |
da Silva (1993) | • QOL (EORTC – Prostate) assessed at 6 months by urologists and patients | • 76 men with metastatic PCA – treated with orchidectomy or hormone therapy | • Because of feasibility problems, comparative analysis not possible • Ratings by urologists correlate poorly with those of patients |
Eton et al. (2001) | • Cross-sectional assessment of QOL (UCLA Prostate Cancer Index) within 7 weeks of launch of treatment. | • Men with localised PCA; 156 treated surgically, 49 with radiotherapy, and 51 with brachytherapy | • 3 treatment groups similar in psychological aspects • Support, self-efficacy and self-esteem predict better QOL |
Litwin et al. | • Observational study of PCA (Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General) patients and age and ZIP-code matched controls | • 214 localized PCA patients • 273 controls |
• No differences in general QOL, including emotional well being, between surgery, radiotherapy and observation only sub-groups, or between PCA patients and controls |
Fossa et al. (1997) | • Cross-sectional, retrospective assessment of QOL (EORTC) | • 379 men with PCA of various stages: 57 observed only, 112 received hormonal therapy, 96 surgery | • Sexual impairment and fatigue common in 3 treated groups but this does not have much effect on ratings of QOL |
Lilleby et al. (1999) | • Controlled, cross-sectional assessment of QOL (EORTC) one year after treatment | • 154 men with PCA of various stages received radiotherapy, 108 surgery; 38 control | • Emotional function similar in 3 groups • Emotional function good or only slightly impaired in most patients |
Cassileth et al. (1992) | • Prospective assessment of QOL (Functional Living Index-Cancer) and mood at 3 and 6 months follow-up | • 159 men with advanced PCA; 115 chose hormone therapy, 32 orchidectomy | • Mood improved at 3 months in both groups • Improvement greater in hormone therapy than orchidectomy patients at 6 months |
Bokhour et al. (2001) | • Participation in focus group (7 groups); qualitative approach to QOL concerns • Men treated 12–24 months previously |
• 48 men with early PCA treated with surgery, radiotherapy or brachytherapy | • Most men had sexual difficulties in terms of sexual relationships, intimacy and sense of masculinity • QOL – sexual effects – treatment type associations not mentioned |
Van Andel et al. (2003) | • QOL (EORTC) assessed pre-treatment only | • 65 patients with localized disease treated surgically, 73 with radiotherapy | • Cognitive, but not emotional, function better in patients about to be treated surgically. Also especially in terms of sexual functioning and fatigue |
Steginga et al. (2004) | • Prospective study before one of three treatments and two and 12 months after treatment • A range of psychological distress scales eg. Impact of Events Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale |
• 111 patients with localised disease – 56% treated surgically, 19% with RT and 25% with watchful waiting | • No differences found by medical treatment group in psychological adjustment at baseline or at follow-up. • Overall QOL similar to community norms |