Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 26;334(7591):460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39070.573032.80

Table 8.

 Use of health care in a trial of insulating houses. Values are number of people (total number of people with available data) unless stated otherwise

Outcome measure Before intervention After intervention Odds ratio (95% CI)
Intervention group Control group Intervention group Control group Unadjusted Adjusted
Primary care
Self reported visit to general practitioner 813 (1448) 769 (1396) 664 (1448) 715 (1396) 0.81 (0.70 to 0.94) P=0.0043 0.73 (0.62 to 0.87) P=0.0002†
General practitioner reported visit 814 (1390) 765 (1346) 769 (1390) 743 (1346) 1.01 (0.86 to 1.17) P=0.9484 0.95 (0.81 to 1.13) P=0.58†
Secondary care*
Admitted to hospital; main code a respiratory condition 7 (1379) 10 (1340) 8 (1386) 14 (1345) 0.552 (0.23 to 1.32) P=0.18 0.53 (0.22 to 1.29) P=0.16 χ2/df=0.89‡
Admitted to hospital; main code a control condition 48 (1379) 56 (1340) 43 (1386) 48 (1345) 0.865 (0.569 to 1.312; P=0.50) 0.90 (0.59 to 1.37) P=0.61§

Outcomes were measured on people with attendance records for both years in primary care and by using a unique identifier in the second year in secondary care.

All adjusted odds ratios were adjusted for age, sex, and ethnic origin.

*Twelve babies were born in the year between the first and second winter; 7 in the intervention group and 5 in the control group.

†Also adjusted for baseline value and region.

‡Also adjusted for region.