Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Sep;47(9):3904–3911. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0161

TABLE 3.

Correlation between Deviations from Expected of PERG Amplitude and PERG-Matched RNFL Thickness with SAP MD

n R P
Suspected glaucoma
  PERG vs. SAP 84 0.225 0.042
  PERG-matched RNFL vs. SAP 84 -0.079 0.479
Early manifest glaucoma
  PERG vs. SAP 34 0.390 0.025
  PERG-matched RNFL vs. SAP 34 0.194 0.289