TABLE 3.
Correlation between Deviations from Expected of PERG Amplitude and PERG-Matched RNFL Thickness with SAP MD
| n | R | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suspected glaucoma | |||
| PERG vs. SAP | 84 | 0.225 | 0.042 |
| PERG-matched RNFL vs. SAP | 84 | -0.079 | 0.479 |
| Early manifest glaucoma | |||
| PERG vs. SAP | 34 | 0.390 | 0.025 |
| PERG-matched RNFL vs. SAP | 34 | 0.194 | 0.289 |