Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar 14;2(3):e284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000284

Table 1. Number of gene-chip predicted SFPs called at different threshold (delta) in datasets.

(a) CP&LG (b) CP&RT (c) LG&RT
Delta p0 FALSE Called FDR Delta p0 FALSE Called FDR Delta p0 FALSE Called FDR
1 0.95 3128.7 13668 0.217 1 0.95 16942.4 110346 0.146 1 0.95 12349 92926 0.126
2 0.95 1134.4 9093 0.119 2 0.95 6457.15 61055 0.100 1.2 0.95 9652.9 80935 0.113
3 0.95 719.8 6865 0.100 3 0.95 4558.5 46306 0.094 1.4 0.95 8131.8 72951 0.106
4 0.95 537.7 5376 0.095 4 0.95 3580.15 37137 0.092 1.6 0.95 7165.1 67299 0.101
5 0.95 423.55 4274 0.094 5 0.95 2905.7 30322 0.091 1.8 0.95 6493.4 62756 0.098
6 0.95 344.85 3488 0.094 6 0.95 2404.95 25325 0.090 2 0.95 5983.9 58918 0.096

The data were analyzed as described [7]. (p0 = the prior probability of the proportion of SFP in the null datasets; Called = the number of SFP at each threshold; False = the number of SFP in the mean permuted dataset; FDR = false discovery rate; CP = Cypress; LG = LaGrue and RT = RT0034.