Table 1. Number of gene-chip predicted SFPs called at different threshold (delta) in datasets.
(a) CP&LG | (b) CP&RT | (c) LG&RT | ||||||||||||
Delta | p0 | FALSE | Called | FDR | Delta | p0 | FALSE | Called | FDR | Delta | p0 | FALSE | Called | FDR |
1 | 0.95 | 3128.7 | 13668 | 0.217 | 1 | 0.95 | 16942.4 | 110346 | 0.146 | 1 | 0.95 | 12349 | 92926 | 0.126 |
2 | 0.95 | 1134.4 | 9093 | 0.119 | 2 | 0.95 | 6457.15 | 61055 | 0.100 | 1.2 | 0.95 | 9652.9 | 80935 | 0.113 |
3 | 0.95 | 719.8 | 6865 | 0.100 | 3 | 0.95 | 4558.5 | 46306 | 0.094 | 1.4 | 0.95 | 8131.8 | 72951 | 0.106 |
4 | 0.95 | 537.7 | 5376 | 0.095 | 4 | 0.95 | 3580.15 | 37137 | 0.092 | 1.6 | 0.95 | 7165.1 | 67299 | 0.101 |
5 | 0.95 | 423.55 | 4274 | 0.094 | 5 | 0.95 | 2905.7 | 30322 | 0.091 | 1.8 | 0.95 | 6493.4 | 62756 | 0.098 |
6 | 0.95 | 344.85 | 3488 | 0.094 | 6 | 0.95 | 2404.95 | 25325 | 0.090 | 2 | 0.95 | 5983.9 | 58918 | 0.096 |
The data were analyzed as described [7]. (p0 = the prior probability of the proportion of SFP in the null datasets; Called = the number of SFP at each threshold; False = the number of SFP in the mean permuted dataset; FDR = false discovery rate; CP = Cypress; LG = LaGrue and RT = RT0034.