Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Virol. 2006 Sep 27;37(4):269–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.08.016

Table 4.

Prevalence and odds ratio of RT-PCR positivity for human metapneumovirus by risk factor, without duplicatesa

Risk factor Crude prevalence %hMPV PCR+ (95% CI) Bivariate analyses OR (95% CI) Multivariable logistic regression OR (95% CI)
Age group (year)
 <0.4  0.7 (0.1–2.5) Reference Reference
 0.4–9  5.1 (3.2–7.6) 7.6 (1.8–32.8) 8.9 (2.0–38.5)
 10–40  1.9 (0.6–4.4) 2.8 (0.5–14.5) 3.2 (0.6–16.9)
 >40  1.8 (0.7–3.9) 2.7 (0.5–13.3) 2.7 (0.5–13.4)
Gender
 Female  3.1 (1.9–4.7) 1.4 (2.7–0)
 Male  2.2 (1.3–3.7) Reference
Patient group
 Intensive care unit 96 (1.9–7.5) 2.3 (0.9–6.3) 3.2 (1.1–8.7)
 Observationb  2.9 (0–6.8) 1.6 (0.3–8) 1.9 (0.4–9.3)
 Hospital ward  2.6 (1.5–4.3) 1.5 (0.6–3.7) 1.9 (0.8–4.6)
 Outpatient  1.8 (0.7–3.6) Reference Reference

Due to missing data the total counts per risk factor are not identical. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

a

Duplicates were defined as multiple specimens with the same laboratory results taken from the same patient during a 2-week period.

b

Patients held for observation but not hospitalized.