Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan;131(1):182–189. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02026.x

Table 2.

The replacement to silent mutation ratios of the heavy chains for the 15 anti-DNA Fabs. Figures in italics are those for which there are no silent mutations

Antibody code R/S ratio in CDR 1 and 2 R/S ratio in CDR 1 R/S ratio in CDR 2 R/S ratio in the framework region Transition mutation rate
R5C08 1·3 1·0 1·5 2·5 42·9
R4C17 3·0 0·0 3·0 3 72·7
R4C09 3·0 0·0 3·0 0·7 35·7
R4C12 0·0 0·0 0·0 2·5 77·8
R5C02 1·0 1·0 0·7 4·5 66·7
P253 3·0 2·0 1·0 5 45·5
R5C20 2·5 2·5 0·0 2 38·5
R4C07 1·0 1·0 0·5 3·6 65·5
P212 3·0 2·0 1·0 3 47·8
R4C15 3·0 0·0 3·0 3 53·3
R4C03 3·0 4·0 2·0 3 37·3
R5C06 5·0 0·0 5·0 8 57·9
R4C04 7·0 2·0 5·0 2·75 33·3
R5C16 8·0 4·0 4·0 3·75 30·8
R5C09 9·0 6·0 3·0 1·625 28·1
Mean 3·4 1·7* 2·2 3·2 48·9
*

Probability value, P > 0·003 when compared with combined R/S ratio for CDR1 and 2; not significant when compared with the R/S ratio for CDR2.