Skip to main content
. 2003 Dec;134(3):378–384. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02286.x

Table 1.

Efficiency of EGFP mRNA lipofection and electroporation in dendritic cells: comparison of different studies

Lipofection Electroporation


Study DC type A B A B
Strobel et al. [19] iMo-DC  16%n.s. 7·6%n.s.
Van Tendeloo et al. [20] iMo-DC 7·5% 9% 63% 78%
mMo-DC 4% 5% 33% 41%
34-LC 0% 0% 50% 62%
34-DC 0% 0% 73% 85%
Saebφe-Larssen et al. [22] iMo-DC n.d. 95%
Kalady et al. [23] iMo-DC n.d. 12% n.d. 50%
Lundqvist et al. [24] iMo-DC 4%n.s. 60%n.s.
34-DC 40%n.s.
Ponsaerts et al. [21] iMo-DC 73% 85%
Van Tendeloo et al. [25] BM-DC 70%n.s.

Efficiencies are given as the number of EGFP-positive cells measured by flow cytometry. DC type: iMo-DC, human immature monocytes-derived dendritic cells; mMo-DC, human mature monocytes-derived dendritic cells; 34-DC, human CD34 progenitor-derived Langerhans cells; 34-DC, human CD34 progenitor-derived dendritic cells; BM-DC, murine bone-marrow derived dendritic cells. A: Transfection efficiency on total DC population (including dead cells). B: Transfection efficiency on viable DC population. n.d.: no data. n.s.: not specified A or B.