Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct;142(1):125–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02883.x

Table 2. Frequency of infiltration into islets of Langerhans a.

Marker 5′ 15′ 30′ 60′ 120′ 180′ 240′ 300′ 360′
TF 2·6 ± 0·4b 2·6 ± 0·4 2·4 ± 0·4 2·75 ± 0·2 2·6 ± 0·2 2·8 ± 0·2 3·0 ± 0·0 3·0 ± 0·0 3·0 ± 0·0
CD16 0·25 ± 0·2 1·0 ± 0·4 1·2 ± 0·4 2·2 ± 0·5 2·6 ± 0·4 2·75 ± 0·2 2·75 ± 0·2 2·75 ± 0·2 3·0 ± 0·0
Lysozyme 1·0 ± 0·4 2·25 ± 0·2 2·25 ± 0·2 2·6 ± 0·2 2·6 ± 0·2 2·6 ± 0·4 2·6 ± 0·4 3·0 ± 0·0 2·8 ± 0·2
a

Staining for CD20, CD4, CD8, eosinophils (detected by cyanide-resistant endogenous peroxidase activity) and CD209 (DC-SIGN) were all negative, i.e. they were not detected in the islets.

b

Frequency of infiltration scored from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating strongly positive staining. All data are expressed as mean ± s.e.m.