Table 1.
Original instrument (item no) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
1 Protocol | Sacks | .58 | ||||||||||
2 Literature Search | Sacks | .82 | ||||||||||
3 List of Trials Analyzed | Sacks | .75 | ||||||||||
4 Log of Rejected Trials | Sacks | .68 | ||||||||||
5 Treatment Assignment | Sacks | .80 | ||||||||||
6 Ranges of Patients | Sacks | |||||||||||
7 Range of Treatment | Sacks | .88 | ||||||||||
8 Range of Diagnosis | Sacks | .80 | ||||||||||
9 CombinabilityCriteria | Sacks | .88 | ||||||||||
10 Measurement | Sacks | .57 | ||||||||||
11 Selection Bias | Sacks | .85 | ||||||||||
12 Data abstraction | Sacks | .50 | ||||||||||
13 Inter-observer Agreement | Sacks | .65 | ||||||||||
14 Sources of Support | Sacks | .64 | ||||||||||
15 Statistical Methods | Sacks | .81 | ||||||||||
16. Statistical Errors | Sacks | |||||||||||
17 Confidence Intervals | Sacks | .73 | ||||||||||
18 Subgroup Analysis | Sacks | |||||||||||
19 Quality Assessment | Sacks | .77 | ||||||||||
20 Varying Methods | Sacks | .63 | ||||||||||
21 Publication Bias 1 | Sacks | .77 | ||||||||||
22 Caveats | Sacks | |||||||||||
23 Economic Impact | Sacks | .84 | ||||||||||
24 Language 1 | Added to Sacks | .79 | ||||||||||
25 Search Strategy | OQAQ (1) | .81 | ||||||||||
26 Was the search comprehensive | OQAQ (2) | |||||||||||
27 Criteria used for deciding which studies to include | OQAQ (3) | |||||||||||
28 Was bias in the selection avoided | OQAQ (4) | .81 | ||||||||||
29 Were the criteria used for assessing the validity reported? | OQAQ (5) | .75 | ||||||||||
30 Was the validity of all studies referred to in the text assessed using appropriate criteria | OQAQ (6) | .53 | .60 | |||||||||
31 Were the methods used to combine the finding of the relevant studies reported | OQAQ (7) | |||||||||||
32 Were the findings of the relevant studies combined appropriately | OQAQ (8) | .78 | ||||||||||
33 Were the conclusions made by the author supported by the data | OQAQ (9) | .68 | ||||||||||
34 Overall Summary | OQAQ (10) | |||||||||||
35. Publication Bias 2 | Additional (1) | .80 | ||||||||||
36 Publication Status | Additional (2) | .77 | ||||||||||
37 Language 2 | Additional (3) | .63 |