Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 21;8:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-58

Table 3.

Comparisons of EasyBack with TIP and BACKTRANSEQ based on the percentages of amino acids correctly decoded.

Test ID EasyBack-FB EasyBack-Vit TIP BACKTRANSEQ
YWHAG 0.77 0.77 0.58 0.66
YWHAE 0.98 0.98 0.51 0.38
HIST4H4 0.44 0.44 0.45 0.48
TBP 0.73 0.73 0.43 0.44
SOD2 0.82 0.83 0.49 0.49
MYH9 0.81 0.80 0.49 0.53
TYR 0.82 0.81 0.46 0.39
HBA2 0.89 0.88 0.63 0.75
HBB 0.86 0.86 0.59 0.59
FGA 0.86 0.86 0.47 0.39
RPL36A 0.83 0.83 0.51 0.51
RPS6KA1 0.71 0.71 0.5 0.59
NP_438418.1 0.47 0.46 0.05 0.18

The training set is the minimal subset of the query output sufficient to make a prediction obtained by a binary search strategy. EasyBack-FB and EasyBack-Vit denote Forward-Backward and Viterbi, respectively. See Figure 14.