Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):3890–3895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.3890

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relative in vitro transcription efficiencies of SP6 promoter variants compared with consensus SP6 promoter. Each position was classified as described in the text, and the classifications (classes A to D) are shown at the bottom. An average of more than three measurements was taken for each variant.