Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Biol. 2006 Mar;13(2):351–363. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.351

Table 1.

The percentage of superfamilies that are consistent with the perfect phylogeny (PP), Static Dollo parsimony (SDP) and conservative Dollo parsimony (CDP) criteria. Databases marked ”(c)” include only super-families meeting complex criteria. ”num domains” indicates that only superfamilies with the specified number of domains in their domain overlap graph were included. ”num super” indicates the number of superfamilies meeting these criteria. % Unif, % PA, and %FD refer to the expected percentage of families admitting a Conservative Dollo parsimony under the uniform, preferential attachment, and fixed degree (endpoint swapping) null models. NE indicates a quantity not estimated.

Database num domains num super %PP %SDP %CDP %Unif %PA %FD
Mouse * 983 95 99 99.7 NE NE NE
Mouse (c) 4-5 88 99 100 100 80 98 100
Mouse (c) 6-8 37 84 100 100 31 66 73
Mouse (c) 9-10 11 66 100 100 17 25 54
Mouse (c) 11-20 23 31 96 96 1.7 1.0 21
Mouse (c) 21-30 9 0 66 100 0 0 0
Mouse (c) 31-* 8 0 50 75 0 0 0
Nr90 * 2896 80 98 99.9 NE NE NE
Nr90 (c) 4-5 143 57 99 99.5 80 98 99
Nr90 (c) 6-8 130 37 99 100 31 66 89
Nr90 (c) 9-10 40 28 100 100 17 25 74
Nr90 (c) 11-20 104 13 87 99 1.7 1.0 26
Nr90 (c) 21-30 34 6 53 88 0 0 2.9
Nr90 (c) 30-* 28 0 15 50 0 0 0
Human Kin * 101 11 100 100 NE NE NE