Skip to main content
. 2006 May 18;574(Pt 3):929–946. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.110379

Table 1.

Phase relationships between activity of rostral STN units and frontal ECoG

Frequency range STN lead Latency (ms)
Record no. (Hz) n r2 P value (Y/N) (±95%CL)
228 m 12.2 29.3 8 0.985 <0.00001 Y 41 ± 5
228r 7.3 17.1 5 0.814 0.0361 Y 39 ± 26
223k1 9.8 22 6 0.927 0.0021 Y 39 ± 15
228b 17.1 26.9 5 0.852 0.0253 Y 20 ± 15
227aa 17.1 29.3 6 0.890 0.0047 Y 38 ± 18
223b2 7.3 17.1 5 0.994 0.0028 Y 20 ± 4
223b2 22 31.7 5 0.915 0.0028 Y 11 ± 4
227z 7.3 29.3 10 0.679 0.0034 Y 21 ± 11
Mean 12.5 25.3 6.3 28.6
s.d. 5.6 5.8 1.8 11.8

STN, subthalamic nucleus; n, number of data points used in linear regression analysis. Note that unit 223b2 showed two peaks of coherence with electrocorticogram (ECoG; shown in Fig. 4C) so that two phase estimates were possible (see Fig. 4D).