Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2006 Dec 28;110(51):26286–26291. doi: 10.1021/jp065489i

TABLE 1.

Dependence of Gprompt(ssb), Gtotal(ssb), and Gtotal(dsb) on Γ for Films of pUC18 X-irradiated at 4 K

1a 2a 3a 4 5b 6c
G Gprompt(ssb) (μmol/J) Gtotal(ssb)a (μmol/J) Gtotal(dsb) (μmol/J) Gtotal(ssb)/Gtotal(dsb) Gsugar(fr) (μmol/J) ΔG′ (μmol/J)
2.5 (0.2) 0.069 (0.014) 0.092 (0.016) 0.0052 (0.0008) 18 (6) 0.033 (0.005) 0.06 (0.02)
7.5 (0.6) 0.058 (0.012) 0.081 (0.014) 0.0046 (0.00081) 17 (4) 0.040 (0.006) 0.04 (0.02)
11.5 (0.3) 0.060 (0.008) 0.078 (0.008) 0.0044 (0.0009) 18 (5) 0.056 (0.008) 0.02 (0.02)
15.0 (0.7) 0.063 (0.008) 0.077 (0.009) 0.0047 (0.0008) 17 (4) 0.069 (0.010) 0.01 (0.02)
22.5 (1.1) 0.054 (0.007) 0.066 (0.008) 0.0039 (0.0005) 17 (3) 0.079 (0.012) −0.01 (0.02)
a

The standard deviations for G′(ssb) and G′(dsb) were calculated from six different sets of gel electrophoresis data and the standard deviations in determining the mass of DNA + solvation shell.

b

Gsugar(fr) is determined from a semiempirical model that predicts 89% of the total free radicals are trapped on the bases and 11% on the sugar–phosphate.17 Unlike the values of Gsugar(fr) in this earlier work, Gsugar(fr) is based on a target mass consisting of DNA + solvation shell; the excess salt is excluded.

c

ΔG′ = Gtotal(ssb) – Gsugar(fr) = the “shortfall”.