Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 5;22(2):210–214. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0051-x

Table 2.

Overview of Mentoring Relationships

  Assistant professors (N = 476) Associate professors (N = 278)
N (%)* χ2 (P) N (%)* χ2 (P)
Have a mentor
Men 291/316(92) .06(.81) 87/199(44) 6.04(.01)
Women 139/152(91)) 42/69(61)
Tenure Track 155/158(98) 12.77(.0017) 29/69(42) 1.48 (.48)
Clinician Educator 211/236(89) 85/168(51)
Research Track 66/76(87) 15/30(50)
Have a male mentor
Men 246/288(85) 16.72 (<.0001) 77/86(90) .06 (.81)
Women 93/136(68) 37/42(88)
Mentor is:
From same department 366/420(87) N/A 106/125(85) N/A
Division chief/chair 153/407(38) N/A 48/118(41) N/A
Mentor was:
Chosen by mentee 148/436(34) N/A 45/127(35) N/A
Assigned 152/436(35) N/A 26/127(20) N/A
Obtained some other way 127/436(29) N/A 55/127(43) N/A
How often meet with mentor
Once a month 139/430(32) N/A 45/131(34) N/A
4–6 times per year 77/430(18) N/A 16/131(12) N/A
2–3 times per year 117/430(27) N/A 36/131(27) N/A
Once a year or less 97/430(23) N/A 34/131(26) N/A
Who initiates meetings with mentor
Mentee 268/420(64) N/A 86/129(67) N/A
Mentor 98/420(23) N/A 26/129(20) N/A
Both 42/420(10) N/A 16/129(12) N/A
Someone Else 12/420(3) N/A 1/129(1) N/A

*The N is the cell or subgroup frequency. Not all N’s sum to total because of small amounts of missing data.