Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2006 Dec 2;366(3):703–710. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.077

Table 1.

Major differences between the apo- and RNA-bound U2AF65 RRM1 structures a

Region apo-U2AF65RRM1 RNA-bound U2AF65RRM1 Figure
β2/β3 loop Poorly ordered Well ordered, shifts to interact with RNA Figure 1(b)
Water molecules near β2/β3 loop Prepositioned for RNA interactions Interacts with Uri3 & Uri4 Figure 1(b); Supp. Figure 1
Aromatic residues in RNP motifs Well ordered Slight shifts to stack with RNA bases Figure 2(c)
Arg150 Major conformation interacts with Gly146 & Glu201; Minor conformation stacks with symmetry-related Phe158 and is most frequent rotamer (44%) Only minor conformation of apo-RRM1-Arg150 is observed, which stacks with RNA base Figure 2(d)
Lys225 Major conformation is most frequent rotamer (42%); Minor conformation is second most frequent rotamer (25%) Only minor conformation of apo-RRM1-Lys225 is observed, which interacts with RNA Figure 2(e)
Arg227 Major conformation interacts with Glu215; Minor conformation is the most frequent rotamer (44%) Only major conformation of apo-RRM1-Arg227 is observed, which interacts indirectly with RNA via water molecule, and directly with Glu215 & dioxane from cryosolvent; Minor conformation would be too close to RNA-bound Lys225 conformation (3.3Å Nζ-NH1 distance) Figure 2(e)
a

Descriptions of minor alternative conformations are distinguished by italics.