Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2582–2590. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2582:etlmdo]2.0.co;2

Table 3.

Results for the randomized regressions (10 000 randomizations) of the proportion of water-filled tree holes occupied (arcsine square-root transformed) vs. mean volume, and the proportion of water-filled tree holes occupied vs. mean hydroperiod. Species

Volume
Hydroperiod
Species Slope SE R2 P N Slope SE R2 P
T. rut 0.0004 0.0002 0.4 0.03 12 0.007 0.003 0.38 0.03
C. app 0.0002 0.0002 0.07 0.42 12 −0.0002 0.0041 0.0002 0.97
O. sig 0.0004 0.0002 0.24 0.1 12 0.003 0.004 0.05 0.49
O. tris −0.00002 0.0003 0.0004 0.94 12 −0.013 0.005 0.42 0.02
A. alb −0.0005 0.0002 0.49 0.08 7 −0.0014 0.0038 0.02 0.74

Notes: Hydroperiod was the number of sampling dates during which a tree hole held water continuously. Abbreviations are: T. rut, Toxorhynchites rutilus; C. app, Corethrella appendiculata; O. sig, Orthopodomyia signifera; O. tris, Ochlerotatus triseriatus; and A. alb, Aedes albopictus.