Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Criminol. 2005 Jan;45(1):81–97. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azh082

Table 3.

Results for armed robbery rates regressed on socioeconomic change, social institutions, and interaction terms (n=78).

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Variables b p-value b p-value b p-value b p-value
Constant 167.247 .041 182.217 .027 165.106 .042 166.601 .041
SE change 0.382 .707 0.483 .633 13.064 .138 0.371 .714
Family 23.045 .661 23.931 .646 23.931 .646 21.012 .688
Log education −4.600 .158 −5.637 .090 −5.637 .090 −4.752 .144
Log polity −39.713 .038 −42.018 .028 −42.018 .028 −40.076 .036
Log inequality 3.492 .406 3.672 .379 3.672 .379 4.567 .286
Alcohol 0.212 .003 0.208 .003 0.208 .003 0.211 .003
Urban 29.029 .003 27.814 .004 27.814 .004 29.433 .002
Log males −10.046 .561 −9.418 .582 −9.418 .582 −10.134 .555
Caucasus 8.343 .054 8.321 .053 8.321 .053 8.635 .046
East 4.224 .144 3.975 .166 3.975 .166 4.505 .119
SE change × Family 81.566 .147
SE change × Education −0.816 .147
SE change × Polity −23.884 .212