Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Criminol. 2005 Jan;45(1):81–97. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azh082

Table 4.

Results for robbery rates regressed on socioeconomic change, social institutions, and interaction terms (n=78).

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Variables b p-value b p-value b p-value b p-value
Constant 656.476 .058 721.704 .038 647.150 .059 654.454 .059
SE change −2.105 .626 −1.668 .697 53.151 .154 −2.141 .620
Family 174.116 .435 177.976 .421 177.976 .421 167.752 .453
Log education 12.539 .362 8.021 .565 8.021 .565 12.063 .382
Log polity −145.254 .073 −155.294 .054 −155.294 .054 −146.387 .071
Log inequality 21.303 .233 22.084 .213 22.084 .213 24.665 .178
Alcohol 0.915 .003 0.896 .003 0.896 .003 0.912 .003
Urban 16.010 .685 10.717 .785 10.717 .785 17.275 .662
Log males 19.063 .794 21.797 .764 21.797 .764 18.787 .797
Caucasus −11.090 .541 −11.189 .534 −11.189 .534 −10.177 .576
East 20.831 .090 19.746 .105 19.746 .105 21.712 .079
SE change × Family 355.397 .136
SE change × Education −3.554 .136
SE change × Polity −74.749 .358