Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2007 Feb;69(1):55–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00343.x

Table 5.

Mean Comparisons of Process Models by Trial.

Men’s issue Women’s issue t
T1 Anger, Affect Clusters, and Affect Ratios
 Men’s anger 3.6 (8.6) 4.8 (10.1) −1.17
 Women’s anger 6.5 (13.2) 8.3 (15.2) −1.30
 Men’s low-intensity negativity 51.0 (55.6) 52.9 (62.8) −0.39
 Women’s low-intensity negativity 66.1 (60.2) 85.8 (67.6) −3.20**
 Men’s high-intensity negativity 21.2 (21.1) 29.8 (28.2) −2.76**
 Women’s high-intensity negativity 26.3 (26.2) 24.1 (20.4) 0.87
 Men’s positive affect 34.8 (27.7) 36.9 (32.2) −0.74
 Women’s positive affect 38.9 (31.8) 31.8 (28.4) 2.77**
 Men’s positive/positive + negative affect 0.4 (0.3) 0.4 (0.3) 1.13
 Women’s positive/positive + negative affect 0.4 (0.4) 0.3 (0.3) 3.20**
T1 Affect Sequences
 Men’s reciprocity of low-intensity negativity 10.6 (16.6) 13.6 (23.7) −1.52
 Women’s reciprocity of low-intensity negativity 10.3 (15.7) 14.1 (24.1) −2.01*
 Men’s reciprocity of high-intensity negativity 2.5 (4.8) 2.3 (3.7) .49
 Women’s reciprocity of high-intensity negativity 2.5 (4.6) 2.2 (3.6) .12
 Men’s negative escalation 4.9 (6.9) 7.3 (10.0) −2.37*
 Women’s negative escalation 4.8 (8.9) 3.7 (5.4) 1.58
 Men’s negative start up 44.6 (43.3) 50.2 (43.5) −1.40
 Women’s negative start up 62.2 (48.6) 74.8 (54.0) −2.81**
 Men’s deescalation of low-intensity negativity 44.9 (42.9) 58.9 (48.4) −2.93**
 Women’s deescalation of low-intensity negativity 32.0 (37.7) 31.0 (37.9) 0.30
 Men’s deescalation of high-intensity negativity 17.0 (15.7) 16.1 (14.5) 0.45
 Women’s deescalation of high-intensity negativity 12.0 (12.3) 17.5 (18.9) −2.59*

N = 85.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.