Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2003 Mar;18(1):54–67. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.54

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics

M
SD
Range
Characteristic Younger Older Younger Older Younger Older
Experiment 1 (n = 24 per group)
Age (years) 20 70a 2 5 18-24 60-81
Education (years) 13 16a 1 3 12-16 12-22
Acuityb 16 28a 2 10 15-20 15-40
Vocabulary (no. correct, max = 70) 62 62 5 5 51-70 52-69
Digit-Symbol accuracy (% correct) 97 95 3 6 86-100 73-100
Digit-Symbol RT (ms) 1,357 1,830a 243 294 1,009-1,969 1,273-2,557
Experiment 2 (n = 32 per group)
Age (years) 20 68a 2 5 18-29 60-81
Education (years) 13 17a 1 3 12-16 12-22
Acuityb 16 26a 4 9 15-30 15-40
Vocabulary (no. correct, max = 70) 61 65a 5 3 53-69 57-70
Digit-Symbol accuracy (% correct) 96 97 3 4 89-100 84-100
Digit-Symbol RT (ms) 1,226 1,598a 176 202 917-1,620 1,216-2,025
Experiment 3 (n = 24 per group)
Age (years) 20 66a 3 6 18-29 60-80
Education (years) 14 16a 2 2 12-18 12-22
Acuityb 15 21a 1 9 15-20 15-40
Vocabulary (no. correct, max = 70) 63 63 5 4 52-69 54-69
Digit-Symbol Accuracy (no. correct) 97 98 3 2 89-100 93-100
Digit-Symbol RT (ms) 1,200 1,830a 241 323 721-1,575 1,224-2,368

Note. max = maximum; RT reaction time.

a

Age group comparison was significant at p < .05 by t test.

b

Denominator of the Snellen fraction for corrected near vision.