Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2006 Nov 15;45(1):179–192. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00750-06

Detection of Multidrug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Jun-ichiro Sekiguchi 1, Tohru Miyoshi-Akiyama 1, Ewa Augustynowicz-Kopeć 2, Zofia Zwolska 2, Fumiko Kirikae 1, Emiko Toyota 1, Intetsu Kobayashi 3, Koji Morita 4, Koichiro Kudo 1, Seiya Kato 5, Tadatoshi Kuratsuji 1,6, Toru Mori 5,7, Teruo Kirikae 1,*
PMCID: PMC1828975  PMID: 17108078

Abstract

We developed a DNA sequencing-based method to detect mutations in the genome of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Drug resistance in M. tuberculosis is caused by mutations in restricted regions of the genome. Eight genome regions associated with drug resistance, including rpoB for rifampin (RIF), katG and the mabA (fabG1)-inhA promoter for isoniazid (INH), embB for ethambutol (EMB), pncA for pyrazinamide (PZA), rpsL and rrs for streptomycin (STR), and gyrA for levofloxacin, were amplified simultaneously by PCR, and the DNA sequences were determined. It took 6.5 h to complete all procedures. Among the 138 clinical isolates tested, 55 were resistant to at least one drug. Thirty-four of 38 INH-resistant isolates (89.5%), 28 of 28 RIF-resistant isolates (100%), 15 of 18 EMB-resistant isolates (83.3%), 18 of 30 STR-resistant isolates (60%), and 17 of 17 PZA-resistant isolates (100%) had mutations related to specific drug resistance. Eighteen of these mutations had not been reported previously. These novel mutations include one in rpoB, eight in katG, one in the mabA-inhA regulatory region, two in embB, five in pncA, and one in rrs. Escherichia coli isolates expressing individually five of the eight katG mutations showed loss of catalase and INH oxidation activities, and isolates carrying any of the five pncA mutations showed no pyrazinamidase activity, indicating that these mutations are associated with INH and PZA resistance, respectively. Our sequencing-based method was also useful for testing sputa from tuberculosis patients and for screening of mutations in Mycobacterium bovis. In conclusion, our new method is useful for rapid detection of multiple-drug-resistant M. tuberculosis and for identifying novel mutations in drug-resistant M. tuberculosis.


The emergence and spread of drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, especially multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, are serious threats to the control of tuberculosis and comprise an increasing public health problem (40). Patients infected with MDR strains, which are defined as strains resistant to both rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH), are difficult to cure and are more likely to remain sources of infection for a longer period of time than are patients with drug-susceptible strains (40).

It is essential that rapid drug susceptibility tests be developed to prevent the spread of MDR M. tuberculosis. The time necessary for culture of specimens was reduced by the radiometric BACTEC 460TB system (BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD), the nonradiometric ESP II system (Trek Diagnostics, Westlake, OH), and other rapid broth methods, such as BACTEC MGIT 960 SIRE (BD Biosciences) (20). These drug susceptibility tests, however, still require 1 to 2 weeks for final determination and reporting to the clinician (23). Additional reductions in the detection period are needed.

Drug resistance in M. tuberculosis is caused by mutations in relatively restricted regions of the genome (17, 39). Mutations associated with drug resistance occur in rpoB for RIF, katG and the promoter region of the mabA (fabG1)-inhA operon for INH, embB for ethambutol (EMB), pncA for pyrazinamide (PZA), rpsL and rrs for streptomycin (STR), and gyrA for fluoroquinolones (FQs) such as ofloxacin (OFX) and levofloxacin (LVX) (17, 39). For example, 96% to 100% of RIF-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates have at least 1 mutation in rpoB, which encodes the RNA polymerase β-subunit (17, 31, 39). Of INH-resistant isolates, 42% to 58% have at least 1 mutation in katG, which encodes catalase-peroxidase, and 21% to 34% carry at least 1 mutation in the promoter of mabA, a synonym for fabG1 (10), which encodes a 3-ketoacyl reductase (3, 17, 38, 39). Of EMB-resistant isolates, 47% to 65% have at least one mutation in embB, which encodes arabinosyltransferase (17, 32, 39). Seventy-two to 97% of PZA-resistant isolates have at least one mutation in pncA, which encodes pyrazinamidase (17, 26, 39). Of STR-resistant isolates, 52% to 59% and 8% to 21% have mutations in rpsL, which encodes ribosomal protein S12, and rrs, which encodes 16S rRNA, respectively (17, 19, 39). Of FQ-resistant isolates, 75% to 94% have mutations in gyrA, which encodes the A subunit of DNA gyrase (17, 30, 39).

Various molecular methods have been used to identify the mutations in rpoB, katG, rpsL, rrs, embB, pncA, gyrA, and other genes (7, 17). Among these methods, DNA sequencing is the most direct and reliable for detection of both known and novel mutations. The conventional methods, nevertheless, are not applicable for analysis of strains that may have multiple mutations in genes related to drug resistance because different PCR conditions are required for amplification of each target region. We describe here a new PCR-based method for simultaneous detection of mutations in eight genes responsible for resistance to six antitubercular drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids.

One hundred five and 33 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were obtained from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Japan and Poland, respectively. All of the bacterial strains used in this study, except for those used in cloning experiments, are listed in Table 1. Escherichia coli UM262 (recA katG::Tn10 pro leu rpsL hsdM hsdR endl lacY) (13) was provided by Barbara L. Triggs-Raine (University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada) and was used as a host for the expression of katG derived from M. tuberculosis clinical isolates and H37Rv, an M. tuberculosis reference strain. E. coli TOP10 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and BL21-AI (Invitrogen) were used as hosts for cloning and protein overexpression studies, respectively. pCRT7/NT (Invitrogen) was used as a cloning and protein expression vector.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains used in the present study

Strain Characteristic(s) or susceptibility pattern No. of isolates Strain Characteristic(s) or susceptibility pattern No. of isolates
M. tuberculosis Clinical strains isolated in Japan 105 M. kansasii JCM 6379 ND 1
    IMCJ Rifr Inhr Embr Pzar Strr Ofxr 3     (ATCC 124878)
Rifr Inhr Embr Pzar Strr 3
Rifr Inhr Pzar Strr 3 M. marinum GTC 616 ND 1
Rifr Inhr Embr Strr 4     (ATCC 927)
Rifr Inhr Embr Pzar 2
Inhr Embr Strr 2 M. nonchromogenicum JCM ND 1
Rifr Inhr 2     6364 (ATCC 19530)
Inhr Strr 4
Pzar Strr 1 M. phlei RIMD 1326001 ND 1
Rifr Strr 2     (ATCC19249)
Rifr 2
Inhr 5 M. scrofulaceum JCM 6381 ND 1
Pzar 2     (ATCC 19981)
Strr 6
Susceptible to all drugs tested 64 M. simiae GTC 620 ND 1
    (ATCC 25275)
M. tuberculosis P Clinical strains isolated in Poland 33
Rifr Inhr Embr Pzar 1 M. smegmatis ATCC 19420 ND 1
Rifr Inhr Embr 2
Rifr Inhr Pzar 1 M. szulgai JCM 6383 ND 1
Rifr Inhr 2     (ATCC 35799)
Inhr Strr 1 M. terrae GTC 623 ND 1
Rifr 1     (ATCC 15755)
Inhr 3
Embr 1 Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 ND 1
Pzar 1
Strr 1 Haemophilis influenzae IIDf
Susceptible to all drugs tested 19     984 (ATCC 9334) ND 1
M. tuberculosis H37Rv Susceptible to all drugs tested 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae ND 1
    (ATCCa 27294)     IID5209 (ATCC 15380)
M. tuberculosis H37Ra Susceptible to all drugs tested 1 Legionella pneumophila ND 1
    (ATCC 25177)     GTC 745
M. avium ATCC 25291 NDg 1 Mycoplasma pneumoniae ND 1
    IID 817
M. bovis BCGb Pzar 1
    (Japanese strain 172) Pseudomonas aeruginosa ND 1
    ATCC 27853
M. chelonae JCMc 6390 ND 1
    (ATCC 14472) Rhodococcus equi ATCC ND 1
    33710
M. fortuitum RIMDd ND 1
    1317004 (ATCC 6841) Staphylococcus aureus N315 ND 1
M. gastri GTCe 610 ND 1 Streptococcus pneumoniae ND 1
    (ATCC 15754)     GTC 261
M. intracellulare JCM 6384 ND 1
    (ATCC 13950)
a

American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD.

b

Japan BCG Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.

c

Japan Collection of Microorganisms, Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Saitama, Japan.

d

Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

e

Gifu Type Culture Collection, Department of Microbiology-Bioinformatics, Regeneration and Advanced Medical Science, Gifu University, Graduate School of Medicine, Bacterial Genetic Resources, Gifu, Japan.

f

Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

g

ND, not determined.

Drug susceptibility test.

All clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis, M. tuberculosis strains H37Rv and H37Ra, and Mycobacterium bovis BCG Japanese strain 172 were tested for drug susceptibility. Strains were analyzed by three different methods. Two methods were agar proportion methods: the Middlebrook 7H10 agar medium method recommended by the United States Public Health Service (20) and the egg-based Ogawa medium method recommended by the Japanese Society for Tuberculosis (Vit Spectrum-SR; Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co., Tokyo, Japan). The third method was a rapid broth method (BD BACTEC MGIT 960 SIRE, BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD) (20). The proportion method with 7H10 agar medium was used to assess susceptibilities to RIF, INH, EMB, STR, and OFX. Ogawa medium was used to test susceptibilities to RIF, INH, EMB, SM, and LVX. The broth method was applied to assess susceptibilities to RIF, INH, EMB, STR, and PZA. All isolates were tested by all three methods.

Assay for PZase activity.

Pyrazinamidase (PZase) activity was determined as described previously (34). M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv, which is susceptible to PZA and positive for PZase, was used as a positive control for the assay. M. bovis strain BCG, which is resistant to PZA and negative for PZase, was used as a negative control. Each test tube was read and classified by three independent observers. There were no discrepancies between the classifications for any of the isolates tested.

DNA extraction.

Genomic DNAs from bacteria were extracted as described previously (21).

Clinical samples.

Six samples of mycobacterial staining-positive sputa from six patients with relapsed active tuberculosis and four samples of staining-negative sputa from four patients who had been treated previously with antitubercular drugs, were treated with N-acetyl-l-cysteine-NaOH solution according to the procedure of the BBL MycoPrep mycobacterial system digestion/decontamination kit (BD Diagnostic Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Each sample was resuspended in 1.5 ml phosphate buffer. One milliliter of the suspension was transferred to a 1.5-ml tube for PCR. The remaining suspension was inoculated into Ogawa medium and MGIT 960 broth and cultured for mycobacterial examination. The 1 ml of suspension for PCR was centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000 × g, and the supernatant was removed with a pipette. Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer (500 μl) was added to resuspend the sediment, and the solution was again centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000 × g. The sediment was resuspended in 100 μl of a 10% solution of Chelex 100 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) in distilled water. The sample was resuspended by vortexing and incubated at 45°C for 45 min followed by incubation at 100°C for 10 min. The sample was vortexed again, allowed to cool, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min to clarify the supernatant, which was transferred to another 1.5-ml tube and used for PCR.

DNA sequencing of drug resistance-related genes.

Eight pairs of PCR primers were designed to amplify simultaneously regions of eight genes associated with resistance to six antituberculosis drugs. Sixteen primers were designed to determine the DNA sequences of the amplicons. The sequences of oligonucleotide primers for PCR, PR1 to PR16, and for DNA sequencing, PR17 to PR32, and the regions analyzed are listed in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Primers used to detect MDR tuberculosis

Target genea Primer set (direction) Nucleotide sequence Positionsb Product size (bp)
PCR primers
    rpoB PR1 (forward) 5′-CCGCGATCAAGGAGTTCTTC-3′ 1256-1275 315
PR2 (reverse) 5′-ACACGATCTCGTCGCTAACC-3′ 1570-1551
    katG PR3 (forward) 5′-GTGCCCGAGCAACACCCACCCATTACAGAAAC-3′ 1-32 2,223
PR4 (reverse) 5′-TCAGCGCACGTCGAACCTGTCGAG-3′ 2223-2200
    mabA promoter PR5 (forward) 5′-ACATACCTGCTGCGCAATTC-3′ −217 to −198 1,362
PR6 (reverse) 5′-GCATACGAATACGCCGAGAT-3′ 1145-1126
    embB PR7 (forward) 5′-CCGACCACGCTGAAACTGCTGGCGAT-3′ 640-665 2,748
PR8 (reverse) 5′-GCCTGGTGCATACCGAGCAGCATAG-3′ 3387-3303
    pncA PR9 (forward) 5′-GGCGTCATGGACCCTATATC-3′ −80 to −61 670
PR10 (reverse) 5′-CAACAGTTCATCCCGGTTC-3′ 590-572
    rpsL PR11 (forward) 5′-CCAACCATCCAGCAGCTGGT-3′ 4-23 572
PR12 (reverse) 5′-GTCGAGAGCCCGCTTGAGGG-3′ 575-556
    rrs (16S RNA) PR13 (forward) 5′-AAACCTCTTTCACCATCGAC-3′ 428-447 1,329
PR14 (reverse) 5′-GTATCCATTGATGCTCGCAA-3′ 1756-1737
    gyrA PR15 (forward) 5′-GATGACAGACACGACGTTGC-3′ −1-19 398
PR16 (reverse) 5′-GGGCTTCGGTGTACCTCAT-3′ 397-379
Sequencing primers
    rpoB PR17 5′-TACGGCGTTTCGATGAAC-3′ (complementary strand) 1529-1512
    katG PR18 5′-ACGTAGATCAGCCCCATCTG-3′ (complementary strand) 689-670
PR19 5′-GAGCCCGATGAGGTCTATTG-3′ 574-593
PR20 5′-CCGATCTATGAGCGGATCAC-3′ 1162-1181
PR21 5′-GAACAAACCGACGTGGAATC-3′ 1729-1748
    mabA promoter PR22 5′-ACATACCTGCTGCGCAATTC-3′ −217 to −198
    embB PR23 5′-ACGCTGAAACTGCTGGCGAT-3′ 646-665
PR24 5′-GTCATCCTGACCGTGGTGTT-3′ 1462-1481
PR25 5′-GGTGGGCAGGATGAGGTAGT-3′ (complementary strand) 1596-1577
PR26 5′-CACAATCTTTTTCGCCCTGT-3′ 2007-2026
PR27 5′-GCGTGGTATCTCCTGCCTAAG-3′ 2581-2601
    pncA PR28 5′-GGCGTCATGGACCCTATATC-3′ −80 to −61
    rpsL PR29 5′-CCAACCATCCAGCAGCTGGT-3′ 4-23
    rrs (16S RNA) PR30 5′-CAGGTAAGGTTCTTCGCGTTG-3′ (complementary strand) 979-959
PR31 5′-GTTCGGATCGGGGTCTGCAA-3′ 1291-1310
    gyrA PR32 5′-GATGACAGACACGACGTTGC-3′ −1-19
a

The complete sequences of target genes in M. tuberculosis H37Rv are in the GenBank database under accession no. NC_000962.

b

Numbering based on nucleotide position relative to the initiation codon of each gene.

A two-temperature PCR consisting of 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 s for denaturation and 68°C for 30 s for annealing and elongation was performed with a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) for DNA amplification, according to the instructions in the manufacturer's manual. Each PCR primer pair in TE (1.0 μl of 10 μM) listed in Table 2 was added to an individual reaction tube (0.2 ml Thermo-Tube; Advanced Biotechnologies, Epsom, Surrey, United Kingdom). Hence, eight reaction tubes containing the different primer pairs were prepared. Forty-nine microliters of a solution containing 1.0 μl DNA template, 1.25 U Z-Taq polymerase (Takara Bio, Ohtsu, Shiga, Japan), 4 μl of 2.5 mM each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and 5 μl of 10× Z Taq PCR buffer (Takara Bio) was added to each reaction tube. The Z-Taq polymerase offers unmatched PCR productivity, with a processing speed five times faster than those of other commercially available Taq polymerases, which allowed us to reduce the annealing and elongation times.

PCR products were purified with MicroSpin S-300 HR columns (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) or a DyeEx 2.0 spin kit (QIAGEN K.K., Tokyo, Japan) and used as templates for DNA sequencing. PCR products were sequenced with the appropriate gene-specific primers (Table 2). Sequencing was performed with an ABI PRISM BigDye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit for a 96-well format (Applied Biosystems). Five microliters of premixed reagents from the kit (Terminator Ready Reaction mix; Applied Biosystems) and 13.5 μl of 1× reaction buffer were added to each tube containing 100 ng of templates and 5 pmol sequencing primer and mixed with a pipette. Amplification conditions were 25 cycles of 96°C for 10 s for denaturation, 50°C for 5 s for annealing, and 60°C for 4 min for elongation. It took 2.5 h to complete the entire reaction. Centri-Sep spin columns (Applied Biosystems) were used to remove unincorporated reagents and primers. Purified products were dried in a vacuum centrifuge, resuspended in Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems), heated for 2 min at 95°C for denaturation, immediately cooled on ice, and loaded into a 96-well plate (MicroAmp 96-well reaction plate; Applied Biosystems). The purified samples were then analyzed with an ABI PRISM 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequences were collected and edited with Data Collection version 1.01 and Sequencing Analysis version 3.7 software (Applied Biosystems) and compared with those of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (GenBank accession no. NC_000962) with Genetyx-WIN (version 5; Software Development Co., Tokyo, Japan). The codon numbers of rpoB were designated on the basis of alignment of the E. coli rpoB sequence with a portion of the M. tuberculosis H37Rv sequence and are not the positions of the actual M. tuberculosis rpoB codons (14, 31).

Cloning of katG.

The coding regions of katG from six INH-resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis, two INH-susceptible isolates, and the H37Rv strain were cloned. katG was amplified by PCR with 2.5 U of Easy-A high-fidelity PCR cloning enzyme (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and primers PR3 and PR4 (Table 2). The PCR products were ligated into the pCRT7/NT vector downstream of the region encoding a His6 tag.

KatG enzyme assays.

For expression of M. tuberculosis KatG, katG-deficient E. coli UM262 (13) cells were transformed with pCRT7/NT carrying cloned katG genes derived from eight clinical isolates and the H37Rv strain. KatG-mediated catalase activity was assayed spectrophotometrically by monitoring the decrease in H2O2 concentration at A240240 = 0.0436 mM−1 cm−1) as described previously (18).

Assay for free-radical formation from INH oxidation.

Rates of KatG-mediated free-radical formation from INH oxidation in the presence of H2O2 were monitored spectrophotometrically by following the reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) as described previously (35).

Purification of KatG.

M. tuberculosis KatG from strain H37Rv was overexpressed in E. coli BL21-AI cells and purified with chelating Sepharose (Ni Sepharose 6 Fast Flow; Amersham Biosciences) loaded with Ni2+ in a column. The purity of the KatG protein was more than 95% by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting.

Purified His-tagged KatG was used as an antigen to raise polyclonal antibodies in a male Japanese white rabbit. Antiserum against KatG was used for Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Data analysis.

The correlations between mutation data from the DNA sequence-based assays and data from conventional culture methods with drugs or PZase activities were assessed by the index of test efficiency. The efficiency of a test was defined as the percentage of times that the test gave the correct answer compared to the total number of tests.

RESULTS

Drug susceptibility patterns.

The susceptibility patterns of the 138 clinical isolates for six drugs, RIF, INH, EMB, PZA, STR, and OFX, are shown in Table 1. Among the 138 clinical isolates, 55 were resistant to at least one drug and 23 were MDR strains displaying resistance to both INH and RIF. Twenty of the 23 MDR strains were resistant to at least one other drug in addition to INH and RIF. Eighty-three clinical isolates and 2 laboratory strains, H37Rv and H37Ra, were susceptible to all of the drugs tested. The BCG strain was sensitive to all drugs tested except PZA. When the results of the proportion method were compared with those of the Vit Spectrum-SR and BD BACTEC MGIT 960 SIRE methods, there was full agreement for all drugs. However, there were some differences in the degrees of susceptibility to INH between the methods. One hundred isolates were susceptible to 0.2 μg/ml of INH when they were assessed with the solid media, whereas only 6 of these isolates were resistant to 0.1 μg/ml of INH when they were tested by the broth method.

Two-temperature PCR.

We optimized a two-temperature PCR strategy to amplify regions of eight drug resistance-related genes in M. tuberculosis. The target regions varied in length from 315 to 2,748 bp (Table 2). Genomic DNA (approximately 100 ng) from M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv was amplified with eight primer pairs simultaneously. The entire procedure, including PCR, took less than 60 min. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide (Fig. 1A). Genomic DNAs from strain H37Ra and 138 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were then amplified by PCR. Each PCR yielded a single band of the expected length (data not shown). These results indicate that the PCR is reliable for use in clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

(A) Amplification products from two-temperature PCR of M. tuberculosis H37Rv. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. Lane M, 1-kbp ladder as a molecular size marker; lane 1, rpoB; lane 2, katG; lane 3, mabA-inhA locus; lane 4, embB; lane 5, pncA; lane 6, rpsL; lane 7, rrs; and lane 8, gyrA. (B) Determination of the sensitivity of two-temperature PCR with serially diluted M. tuberculosis H37Rv DNA as a template. Experiments were repeated twice with similar results. Lane 1, 100 ng of template DNA; lane 2, 10 ng; lane 3, 1 ng; lane 4, 100 pg; lane 5, 10 pg; lane 6, 1 pg.

Sensitivity and specificity of two-temperature PCR.

To determine the sensitivity of the two-temperature PCR for the target DNA, 100, 10, and 1 ng and 100, 10, and 1 pg of genomic DNA from M. tuberculosis H37Rv were amplified with the PCR assay. As shown in Fig. 1B, the limits of detection for mabA-inhA and rpoB, for gyrA, pncA, and rpsL, and for embB, katG, and rrs were 10 pg, 100 pg, and 1 ng of DNA, respectively.

To determine the species specificity of the PCR, genomic DNA (100 ng) was isolated from various species of bacteria, including Mycobacterium spp. and additional pathogenic bacterial species listed in Table 1. DNA was amplified with the PCR primer pairs shown in Table 2. The PCR patterns for M. bovis BCG were identical to those of M. tuberculosis (Table 3). Some mycobacterial species were positive for the PCR with primer pairs for rpsL, rrs, and gyrA; however, all mycobacterial species except M. tuberculosis and M. bovis were negative for rpoB-, katG-, mabA-, embB-, and pncA-specific PCR products (Table 3). Nonmycobacterial strains tested were negative for all eight gene targets.

TABLE 3.

Species specificity of two-temperature PCR

Bacterium Origin Results of PCR with various primer pairsg
rpoB katG mabA-inhA embB pncA rpsL rrs gyrA
M. tuberculosis IMCJ 105 clinical isolates from Japan + + + + + + + +
M. tuberculosis P 33 clinical isolates from Poland + + + + + + + +
M. tuberculosis H37Rv ATCCa 27294 + + + + + + + +
M. tuberculosis H37Ra ATCC 25177 + + + + + + + +
M. bovis BCG Japanese strain 172 Japan BCG Laboratoryb + + + + + + + +
M. avium ATCC 25291 + +
M. gastri GTCc 610 (ATCC 15754) + + +
M. intracellulare JCMd 6384 (ATCC 13950) + +
M. kansassii JCM 6379 (ATCC 124878) + +
M. marinum GTC 616 (ATCC 927) + + +
M. simiae GTC 620 (ATCC 25275) +
M. scrofulaceum JCM 6381 (ATCC 19981) +
M. szulgai JCM 6383 (ATCC 35799) + + +
M. nonchromogenicum JCM 6364 (ATCC 19530) +
M. terrae GTC 623 (ATCC 15755)
M. chelonae JCM 6390 (ATCC 14472) +
M. fortuitum RIMDe 1317004 (ATCC 6841) +
M. phlei RIMD 1326001 (ATCC 19249)
M. smegmatis ATCC 19420 +
Escherichia coli ATCC 8739
Haemophilus influenzae IIDf 984 (ATCC 9334)
Klebsiella pneumoniae IID5209 (ATCC 15380)
Legionella pneumophila GTC 745
Mycoplasma pneumoniae IID 817
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853
Rhodococcus equi ATCC 33710
Staphylococcus aureus N315
Streptococcus pneumoniae GTC 261
a

American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD.

b

Japan BCG Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.

c

Gifu Type Culture Collection, Department of Microbiology-Bioinformatics, Regeneration and Advanced Medical Science, Gifu University, Graduate School of Medicine, Bacterial Genetic Resources, Gifu, Japan.

d

Japan Collection of Microorganisms, Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Saitama, Japan.

e

Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

f

Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

g

Amplification results were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. Symbols: +, presence of amplification products; −, absence of amplification products.

Sequencing of rpoB, katG, mabA-inhA, embB, pncA, rpsL, rrs, and gyrA of M. tuberculosis.

PCR products were purified and then sequenced with the 16 sequencing primers listed in Table 2. Sequencing yielded 8.8 kb of sequence for each M. tuberculosis strain. Sequences were obtained for regions of the rpoB, katG, mabA, embB, pncA, rpsL, rrs, and gyrA genes and the promoters of mabA-inhA and pncA. The mutations identified in the 138 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis are shown in Table 4.

TABLE 4.

Nucleotide and amino acid changes found in 138 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosisaa

Gene No. of isolates (n = 138) Isolate origin Changes
% Resistant (no. of isolates displaying resistance) Other mutations
Nucleotide Amino acid (silent mutation)
rpoBb 83 Japan None None 0
26 Poland None None 0
1 Japan TCG→TTG S450L* 0
1 Poland CAA→CTA Q513L 100
1 Japan GAC→GTC D516V 100
1 Japan TCG→TTG S522L 100
1 Japan CAC→TAC H526Y 100
2 Japan CAC→CGC H526R 100
1 Poland CAC→ACC H526T 100
7 Japan TCG→TTG S531L 100
5 Japan TCG→TGG S531W 100
5 Poland TCG→TTG S531L 100
2 Japan AGC→AGG and CAC→CGC S509R* and H526R 100
2 Japan ATG→ATT and GAC→TAC M515I and D516Y 100
katG 14 Japan None None 0
23 Poland None None 4.4 (1)
1 Japan CTG→TTG (L653L) 0
1 Japan GCC→ACC A65T* 0
1 Japan GCG→CTG A245V* 0
1 Poland CAG→CCG Q295P* 100
1 Poland GGC→GTC G297V* 100
4 Japan AGC→ACC S315T 100
2 Japan AGC→AAC S315N 100
3 Poland AGC→ACC S315T 100
1 Japan GTC→GCC V725A* 0
63 Japan CGG→CTG R463L 3.2 (2)
2 Japan CGG→CTG R463L 100 −15C→T upstream of mabA
1 Poland ACC→CCC T324P* 100 −15C→T upstream of mabA
7 Japan AGC→ACC and CGG→CTG S315T and R463L 100
2 Japan TTG→TTC and CGG→CTG L141F* and R463L 100
1 Japan ATG→ACG and CGG→CTG M257T* and R463L 100 −5T→A* upstream of mabA
1 Japan CTG→CAG and CGG→CTG L48Q* and R463L 100 −15C→T upstream of mabA
1 Japan ATG→ACG, CGG→CTG, and GTC→GCC M257T*, R463L and V708P* 100 −15C→T upstream of mabA
2 Japan CTA insertion at position 1170 L390 insertion* 100
mabA-inhA operonc 97 Japan None None 0
29 Poland None None 3.4 (1)
2 Japan −15C→T upstream of mabA None 100 R463L in katG
1 Poland −15C→T upstream of mabA None 100 T324P* in katG
1 Japan −15C→T upstream of mabA None 100 L48Q* and R463L in katG
1 Japan −15C→T upstream of mabA None 100 M257T*, R463L and V708P* in katG
1 Japan −15C→T upstream of mabA None 100
4 Poland −15C→T upstream of mabA None 100
1 Japan −8T→A upstream of mabA None 100
1 Japan −5T→A* upstream of mabA None 100 M257T* and R463L in katG
embB 77 Japan None None 0
30 Poland None None 3.3 (1)
2 Japan GAC→GAT (D345D) 100 (2)
1 Japan GAC→GAT (D534D) 0
5 Japan ATG→GTG M306V 100
1 Japan ATG→ATT M306I 100
1 Japan ATG→ATC M306I 100
2 Poland ATG→ATA M306I 100
2 Japan GAC→GCC D354A* 100
Nucleotide Amino acid (silent mutation)
4 Japan GAG→GCG E378A 0
1 Japan GTG→TTG V492L* 0
1 Poland CAG→CGG Q497R 100
2 Japan GCC→ACC A680T* 0
3 Japan GCC→GTC A1007V* 0
1 Japan GAC→AAC D1024N 0
2 Japan CTG→CTA and GAG→GCG (L355L) and E378A 0
1 Japan AAT→TAT and ATG→ATA N296Y* and M306I 100
2 Japan ATG→CTG, GAG→GCG, and CCC→CCA M306L, E378A, and (P1075P) 100
pncA 89 Japan None None 0
30 Poland None None 0
2 Japan TCC→TCT (S65S) 0
1 Japan GCG→GAG A3E* 100
1 Poland CAG→CCG Q10P 100
1 Japan GAC→GCC D12A 100
2 Japan CAC→CAA H51Q 100
1 Poland CAC→CAG H51Q 100
3 Japan CCG→CTG P54L* 100
1 Japan TGC→TGG C72W* 100
2 Japan GGT→AGT G132S 100
2 Japan ATT→ACT I133T 100
1 Poland CGC→AGC R148S 100
1 Japan ATG→GTG M175V* 100
1 Japan GAC→AAC D53N* 100
gyrA 7 Japan GAG→CAG E21Q* 0
11 Poland GAG→CAG E21Q* 0
95 Japan GAG→CAG and AGC→ACC E21Q* and S95T 0
22 Poland GAG→CAG and AGC→ACC E21Q* and S95T 0
1 Japan GAG→CAG, GAC→GGC, and AGC→ACC E21Q*, D94G, and S95T 100
1 Japan GAG→CAG, GCG→GTG, and AGC→ACC E21Q*, A90V, and S95T 100
1 Japan GAG→CAG, GCG→GTG, GAC→GCC, and AGC→ACC E21Q*, A90V, D94A, and S95T 100
rpsL 87 Japan AAA→AAG (K121K) 11.5 (10)
33 Poland AAA→AAG (K121K) 6.1 (2)
2 Japan AAA→AAG (K121K) 100 516C→T in rrs
1 Japan AAA→AAG (K121K) 100 1,061C insertion* in rrs
1 Japan AAA→AAG (K121K) 100 1,400A→G in rrs
1 Japan AAA→AAG (K121K) 100 1,400A→G and 1539A→G in rrs
13 Japan AAG→AGG and AAA→AAG K43R and (K121K) 100
rrs 33 Poland None 6.1 (2) (K121K) in rpsL
87 Japan None 11.5 (10) (K121K) in rpsL
13 Japan None 100 K43R and (K121K) in rpsL
2 Japan 516C→T 100 (K121K) in rpsL
1 Japan 1,061C insertion* 100 (K121K) in rpsL
1 Japan 1,400A→G 100 (K121K) in rpsL
1 Japan 1,400A→G and 1539A→G 100 (K121K) in rpsL
a

*, mutation not previously reported.

b

The codon numbering system of RpoB initially described by Telenti et al. (31) was used. The codon numbers of RpoB are designated on the basis of alignment of translated E. coli rpoB sequence with a portion of translated M. tuberculosis sequence and are not the positions of the actual M. tuberculosis rpoB codons.

c

Nucleotide numbering based on nucleotide position relative to mabA start codon.

(i) rpoB.

We sequenced a 240-bp fragment containing the “81-bp core region” of rpoB. One hundred nine isolates had no mutations in rpoB. The remaining 25 each had a single point mutation, and 4 isolates each had two point mutations. All of the detected mutations resulted in amino acid substitutions. Of these mutations, two, S450L (TCG→TTG at nucleotide [nt] positions 1348 to 1350) and S509R (AGC→AGG at nt positions 1525 to 1527) were novel (Table 4).

(ii) katG.

Thirty-seven isolates had no mutations in katG, whereas 81 isolates each had a single point mutation, 11 isolates had two point mutations each, 1 isolate had three point mutations, and 2 isolates had a 3-bp insertion each. One mutation was a silent mutation (CTG→TTG at nt positions 1957 to 1959 [L653L]), and all others caused amino acid substitutions. We identified 10 novel point mutations and the novel L390 insertion.

(iii) mabA-inhA locus.

We found no mutations in the mabA gene and the regulatory region of mabA-inhA in 126 isolates. Ten isolates had a C-to-T transition −15 bp upstream of the mabA initiation codon, 1 isolate had a T-to-A transition 8 bp upstream of the initiation codon, and 1 isolate had a T-to-A transition 5 bp upstream of the initiation codon. The T-to-A transition −5 bp upstream of the initiation codon was novel.

(iv) embB.

We found no mutations in embB in 107 isolates. Twenty-six isolates each had a single point mutation, 3 each had two point mutations, and 2 each had three point mutations. Several isolates had silent mutations (D345D, D534D, L355L, and P1075P). Five of these point mutations were novel.

(v) pncA.

One hundred nineteen isolates had no mutations in pncA or the pncA regulatory region. Nineteen isolates each had a single point mutation. Five of these mutations were novel.

(vi) gyrA.

All isolates tested contained the E21Q mutation of gyrA. Eighteen isolates each had one point mutation, 117 isolates each had two point mutations, 2 isolates each had three point mutations, and 1 isolate carried four mutations.

(vii) rpsL.

All isolates carried the K121K mutation of rpsL.

One hundred twenty-five isolates each had a single point mutation, and the remaining 13 isolates each had two point mutations.

(viii) rrs.

One hundred thirty-three isolates had no mutations in rrs. Two isolates had a C-to-T transition at nt position 516. One isolate had an A-to-G transition at nt position 1400. One isolate had two point mutations, an A-to-G transition at nt position 1400 and an A-to-G transition at nt position 1539. One isolate had an insertion of a cytosine at position 1061 of rrs.

Correlation between drug susceptibility and mutation(s) in M. tuberculosis. (i) RIF resistance and rpoB.

Mutations in the 81-bp core region of rpoB are responsible for resistance in at least 96% of RIF-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates (17, 31, 39). In the present study, we identified two novel mutations, S450L (TCG→TTG at nt positions 1348 to 1350) and S509R (AGC→AGG at nt positions 1525 to 1527). S450L was located upstream of the 81-bp core region, and the isolate with S450L was susceptible to RIF, indicating this mutation is not associated with RIF resistance. Isolates with both S509R and H526R (CAC→CGC at nt positions 1576 to 1578) mutations were RIF resistant. However, it is unclear whether S509R is associated with RIF resistance because H526R is known to be associated with RIF resistance (39).

(ii) INH resistance and katG and mabA-inhA.

INH resistance is related to mutation(s) in katG, inhA, and/or the promoter region of mabA-inhA (17, 22, 38, 39). In the present study, we found 11 novel mutations and a CTA insertion at nt position 1170 in katG. Among these mutations, Q295P and G297V conferred INH resistance. Two INH-resistant isolates carried the L141F and R463L mutations. R463L is known not to be associated with INH resistance (33, 39), and L141F may confer INH resistance. The A65T, A245V, and V725A mutations did not influence INH susceptibility. Isolates carrying the T324P, L48Q, or M257T mutation and −15C→T upstream of mabA were resistant to INH. However, it is unclear whether T324P, L48Q, or M257T is related to INH resistance because the −15C→T upstream of mabA is known to confer INH resistance (10, 22, 39).

(iii) EMB resistance and embB.

EMB resistance is related to mutations in embB (17, 32, 39). In the present study, we found five novel mutations in embB. Among these, D354A conferred EMB resistance. V492L, A680T, and A1007V were not associated with EMB resistance. An isolate with both N296Y and M306I was resistant to EMB. However, it is unclear whether N296Y is related to EMB resistance because the M306I mutation is known to confer EMB resistance (39).

(iv) PZA resistance and pncA.

It is known that PZA resistance is related to mutations in pncA (17, 26, 39). In the present study, we identified five novel mutations in pncA. Among these, A3E, D53N, P54L, C72W, and M175V conferred PZA resistance. It will be necessary to determine whether the PZA activities of various mutants are correlated with PZA susceptibility. We then evaluated the PZase activities of M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, strains H37Rv and H37Ra, and M. bovis strain BCG. The BCG strain was included as a negative control as described in Materials and Methods. One hundred twenty-one clinical isolates and H37Rv and H37Ra were positive for PZase activity (data not shown). The remaining 17 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates and M. bovis BCG were negative for PZase activity. All PZase-positive bacilli were sensitive to PZA, and all PZase-negative bacilli were resistant to PZA. These data were consistent with previously published results (15, 39).

(v) STR resistance and rpsL and rrs.

STR resistance is related to mutations in rpsL and rrs (17, 19, 39). In the present study, all isolates, regardless of STR resistance status, had a silent mutation (K121K) in rpsL, and, therefore, the K121K mutation is not associated with STR resistance.

We found a novel insertional mutation in rrs. The insertion is the likely cause of STR resistance, because the isolate with the mutation was resistant to STR.

(vi) FQ resistance and gyrA.

Mutations in the FQ resistance-determining region (QRDR) in gyrA are responsible for resistance in at least 96% of FQ-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates (17, 30, 39). In the present study, we found one novel mutation, E21Q, in gyrA, and all isolates tested, except the H37Rv strain, contained this mutation. However, some isolates were susceptible to FQs and others were resistant. Therefore, it is not clear that this mutation is associated with resistance to FQs. E21Q is located upstream of the QRDR.

Catalase and INH oxidation activities of recombinant KatG mutants.

KatG, catalase-peroxidase, converts INH to its biologically active form (38). Some mutations in katG reduce or eliminate the enzymatic activity that is associated with INH resistance (9, 39). To measure catalase and INH oxidation activities, we expressed wild-type KatG and the A245V, Q295P, G297V, T324P, L48Q-R463L, L141F-R463L, R463L, and L390 insertion mutants of KatG in katG-deficient E. coli (Fig. 2A and Table 5). The catalase activities of these mutants were determined at various H2O2 concentrations. The kcat, Km, and kcat/Km ratio values are shown in Table 5. Catalase activity was not detected for the KatGQ295P, KatGG297V, KatGT324P, KatGL141F-R463L, or KatGL390 insertion mutants. The kcat of the KatGL48Q-R463L mutant was 26% lower than that of wild-type KatG. In contrast, the KatGA245V and KatGR463L mutants showed activities similar to that of wild-type KatG.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

(A) Western blot analysis of whole-cell protein extracts from KatG-deficient E. coli strain UM262 complemented with a control plasmid, pCRT7/NT, or recombinant plasmids expressing various KatG mutants. Lane 1, wild-type KatG; lane 2, KatGQ295P; lane 3, KatGT324P; lane 4, KatGL48Q-R463L; lane 5, KatGR463L; lane 6, KatGG297V; lane 7, KatGA245V; lane 8, KatGL390 insertion; lane 9, KatGL141F-R463L; lane 10, purified KatG protein; lane 11, control plasmid pCRT7/NT; and lane 12, E. coli strain UM262. The positions of molecular mass markers are shown. (B) Time course of NBT reduction with and without the addition of 2.4 mM INH with wild-type KatG. Abs, absorbance. (C) Time course of net INH-dependent NBT reduction by wild-type KatG (WT) and eight KatG mutants. For each KatG sample tested, NBT reduction in the absence of INH was subtracted from that in the presence of INH to obtain the net INH-dependent NBT reduction over time. The concentration of KatG was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

TABLE 5.

Catalase activity of wild-type and mutant KatG, KatG-mediated INH-converting activity, and INH susceptibility

Recombinant KatGa Catalase activity
KatG-mediated INH-converting activityb INH susceptibilityc
kcat (S−1) Km (mM) kcat/Km ratio (mutant/wild type)
Wild type 2,403 ± 440 60.1 ± 9.5 1.00 + S
A245V* 2,666 ± 530 62.8 ± 10.8 1.06 + S
Q295P* NDd ND NAe R
G297V* 188 ± 36 68.7 ± 7.0 0.07 R
T324P* ND ND NA R
L48Q*-R463L 1,776 ± 310 64.8 ± 12.5 0.69 + R
L141F*-R463L ND ND NA R
R463L 2543 ± 450 64.0 ± 11.0 1.01 + S
L390 (CTA) insertion* ND ND NA R
a

*, novel mutation.

b

Time courses of net KatG-mediated INH conversion are shown in Fig. 2C.

c

INH susceptibilities shown are those of M. tuberculosis H37Rv strains having the katG gene of the wild type and those of clinical strains having the katG gene with the respective mutation(s). S, susceptible; R, resistant.

d

ND, not detected.

e

NA, not applicable.

The INH oxidation activities of the mutants were determined in the presence of H2O2 by monitoring the free radical generation in the NBT reduction reaction. When wild-type KatG was tested in this assay, there was a significant background activity of NBT reduction in the absence of INH, whereas the NBT reduction was increased significantly in the presence of INH (Fig. 2B). We subtracted the background activity to obtain the net INH oxidation/NBT reduction. The net values are shown in Fig. 2C. The KatGQ295P, KatGG297V, KatGT324P, KatGL141F-R463L, and KatGL390 insertion mutants did not show enhanced activity, whereas wild-type KatG and the KatGL48Q-R463L, KatGA245V, and KatGR463L mutants of KatG showed significant enhancement of activity in the presence of INH.

Collectively, these results for the enzymatic activities of KatG mutants indicate that the Q295P, G297V, T324P, L141F, and L390 insertion mutants cause loss of enzymatic activity, whereas the A245V and R463L mutants have no effect on the enzymatic activity. The L48Q mutation has little effect on enzymatic activity; however, there was no isolate that carried only the L48Q mutation in KatG in the present study. These mutations and enzymatic activities, except for those of the L48Q-R463L mutant, correlated well with INH susceptibility (Table 5). The L48Q-R463L mutant also carried the −15C→T transition upstream of mabA (Table 4). Therefore, the INH resistance of this mutant is likely due to the −15C→T mutation, which is known to be related to INH resistance (10, 22, 39).

Sequencing of rpoB, katG, mabA-inhA, embB, pncA, rpsL, rrs, and gyrA of M. bovis BCG.

PCR products amplified from rpoB, katG, mabA-inhA, embB, pncA, rpsL, rrs, and gyrA of M. bovis BCG were sequenced with the same sequencing primers as those for M. tuberculosis (Table 2). When the nucleotide sequences of BCG were compared with those of M. bovis AF2122/97 (GenBank accession no. NC_002945) (8), the sequences were identical. When the sequences of M. bovis BCG were compared with those of M. tuberculosis H37Rv, the sequences of rpoB, the promoter region of the mabA-inhA operon, and rrs were identical. The R463L (CGG→CTG at nt positions 1387 to 1389) and silent P29P (CCC→CCA at nt positions 85 to 87) mutations were found in katG of BCG. E378A (GAG→GCG at nt positions 1159 to 1161) in embB, H57D (CAC→GAC at nt positions 169 to 171) in pncA, K121K (AAA→AAG at nt positions 361 to 363 [silent]) in rpsL, and S95T (AGC→ACC at nt positions 283 to 285) in gyrA were identified in M. bovis BCG.

Correlation between drug susceptibility and mutations in BCG.

We next compared the sequences of BCG and M. tuberculosis H37Rv and found four mutations, R463L in katG, E378A in embB, H57D in pncA, and S95T in gyrA, that caused amino acid substitutions in M. bovis BCG. R463L in katG is known not to be associated with INH resistance in M. tuberculosis (33) and may not be associated with INH resistance in M. bovis. E378A in embB is not associated with EMB resistance in M. tuberculosis (32, 39). H57D in pncA was reported previously and is characteristic of PZA resistance in M. bovis (39). S95T in gyrA is not associated with FQ resistance in M. tuberculosis (39). Therefore, in M. bovis, mutations except H57D in pncA may be polymorphisms not associated with drug resistance.

Detection and sequencing of drug resistance-related genes of M. tuberculosis in sputa from tubercular patients.

We tested a total of 10 sputa from 10 tuberculosis-diagnosed patients. These patients had been received treatment with antitubercular drugs. Of these samples, six were positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB; >101/field in two samples, 26 to 50/field in two samples, 1/field in one sample, and 1/several fields in one sample) under microscopic observation, and four were negative. Five of the six samples that were positive for AFB were positive for all eight genes tested by PCR. One sample which was positive for AFB (one/several fields) was positive for five genes (rpoB, pncA, rpsL, rrs, and gyrA) by PCR. The four AFB-negative samples yielded no PCR products and were negative by culture, suggesting that tuberculosis was not active in these patients who had received treatment.

PCR products (a total of 45) were subjected to DNA sequencing. No mutations were identified in 38 of the PCR products. The remaining seven PCR products contained nine mutations. The seven PCR products were obtained from one sputum sample. The sputum sample was cultured, and after several weeks, an isolate of M. tuberculosis was obtained and analyzed. We conducted PCR analysis of this isolate and detected the same nine mutations. This isolate was resistant to RIF, INH, EMB, STR, FQs, and PZA. These results indicate that our DNA sequencing-based method can be used to detect MDR strains of M. tuberculosis in sputa obtained from clinical tuberculosis patients.

DISCUSSION

Our novel DNA sequencing-based method described here is useful for detection and diagnosis of drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis, especially MDR strains. Our method has several advantages. First, it allows simultaneous detection of mutations in eight genes associated with resistance to six antituberculosis drugs. Second, the entire assay from DNA extraction to the DNA sequencing can be completed within 1 working day. Third, this method is sensitive enough to detect 1 ng of genomic DNA (i.e., 3 × 105 M. tuberculosis cells). We found that this method worked well even in positive sputum containing few bacilli, as determined by acid-fast staining. Fourth, our DNA sequencing-based method allows detection of both novel and known mutations. In the present study, we identified 25 novel mutations by PCR-based analysis.

This strategy does have a few disadvantages. The DNA sequencer and sequencing are costly, and the procedure is somewhat complicated. However, this issue may be addressed if DNA sequencing costs are reduced by new sequencing methods and equipment. Also, this strategy may not be able to detect very low numbers of bacilli in sputa. We did not have the opportunity to test AFB smear-negative but culture-positive samples. Among the smear- and culture-positive samples we tested, one sample with small numbers of bacilli (one/several fields) was negative for three of the eight genes tested, indicating that the sensitivity of this method is limited. However, the sensitivity and accuracy of our method are comparable to those of traditional drug susceptibility tests, and this is sufficient for use in the clinical setting.

The method described here was excellent for diagnosis of RIF-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates with 100% specificity, sensitivity, and test efficiency. RIF interferes with the synthesis of mRNA by binding to the β-subunit of RNA polymerase (RpoB) in bacterial cells (39). The RIF-binding site is a pocket in the upper wall of the main channel for double-stranded DNA entry just upstream of the polymerase catalytic center. The various RIF-resistant mutations are clustered around this pocket (39). Mutations in rpoB have been found in 95% to 100% of clinical RIF-resistant isolates of M. tuberculosis (39). Most of the mutations found in the 28 RIF-resistant isolates tested here were located between nucleotides 1276 and 1356 (codons 507 to 533) of rpoB, which is the 81-bp core region of this gene (Table 4) (31, 39). Two other mutations, V146F and E562A, were located outside of the 81-bp core region. Isolates with V146F were reported to show low-level resistance to RIF (MIC, ≤4 μg/ml) (39). It is not known whether the E562A mutation is involved in resistance because the isolate with this mutation also had another mutation in the 81-bp core region (39). The V146F mutation could not be detected by the DNA sequencing method described here. Although we were able to detect the E562A mutation by our sequencing method, we did not find this mutation in any of 138 isolates tested in the present study.

Our sequencing method is applicable for diagnosis of INH-resistant isolates with 89.5% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 97.1% test efficiency (Table 6). The sensitivity of the two-temperature PCR for katG was lower than that of the PCR for rpoB or mabA-inhA (Fig. 1B), and, therefore, we will need to increase the sensitivity to detect katG mutations to assess INH resistance. The mode of INH action is one of the most complicated among all antibiotics. INH is a prodrug that requires activation of the bacterial catalase-peroxidase enzyme (KatG) (38) to generate a range of reactive radicals, which then affect multiple systems, including cell wall mycolic acid synthesis and lipid peroxidation and NAD metabolism, and cause DNA damage (39). Deficient efflux of INH radicals and defective antioxidative defenses may underlie the susceptibility of M. tuberculosis to INH (39). Mutations in katG are among the most frequently detected mutations in INH-resistant clinical isolates. Mutations in inhA and its promoter region, which is located upstream of the mabA-inhA operon, are also common (16, 17, 39). Our sequencing method should identify a majority of INH-resistant isolates. We are able to detect mutations in katG and the region upstream of mabA in 90% (34/38) of INH-resistant isolates. Ten different mutations (L48Q, L141F, M257T, Q295P, G297V, S315T, S315N, T324P, R463L, and V708P) were detected in katG of INH-resistant isolates, and 3 mutations (A65T, A245V, and V725A) were identified in INH-susceptible isolates. The L48Q, A65T, L141F, A245V, M257T, Q295P, G297V, T324P, V708P, V725A, and L390 insertion mutations are novel (Table 4).

TABLE 6.

The diagnostic performance of the DNA sequencing-based method in comparison with drug susceptibility testinga

Drug susceptibility test resultb No. of isolates (n = 138)
% Sensitivityc % Specificityd % Test efficiencye
Mutation positive Mutation negative
RIF
    Resistant 28 0 100 100 100
    Susceptible 0 110
INH
    Resistant 34 4 89.5 100 97.1
    Susceptible 0 100
EMB
    Resistant 15 3 83.3 100 97.8
    Susceptible 0 120
PZA
    Resistant 17 0 100 100 100
    Susceptible 0 121
STR
    Resistant 18 12 60.0 100 91.3
    Susceptible 0 108
OFX
    Resistant 3 0 100 100 100
    Susceptible 0 135
a

The diagnostic performance of the DNA sequencing-based method in comparison with drug susceptibility testing was determined after resolution of polymorphisms.

b

Drug susceptibility for antituberculosis agents except for PZA was determined by the agar proportion method according to NCCLS (now CLSI) guidelines, and that for PZA was determined by PZase activity.

c

Sensitivity: no. of drug-resistant isolates with mutations/(no. of drug-resistant isolates with mutations + no. of drug-resistant isolates without mutations).

d

Specificity: no. of drug-susceptible isolates without mutations/(no. of drug-susceptible isolates with mutations + no. of drug-susceptible isolates without mutations).

e

Test efficiency: (no. of drug-resistant isolates with mutations + no. of drug-susceptible isolates without mutations)/no. of all isolates tested.

To date, several mutations in katG in MDR isolates have been reported (9, 16, 17, 38, 39). Rouse et al. (24) reported previously that codons 104 and 108 encode amino acids located near the catalytic site of KatG and that the residues encoded by codons 270, 275, and 315 participate in binding the heme group of KatG (24). Mutations in these regions, therefore, are thought to cause loss of KatG enzymatic function (24). Yu et al. (36) reported that residue W321 of KatG was important for substrate binding and that residue Y229 was critical to protect the catalase activity of KatG (37). We compared the catalase and INH oxidation activities of eight KatG mutants identified in this study with those of the wild type. Although we were able to express all of the KatG mutants (Fig. 2A), we were unable to detect the catalase and INH oxidation activities of four KatG mutants, KatGQ295P, KatGT324P, KatGL141F-R463L, and KatGL390 insertion (Table 5 and Fig. 2C). The specific effects of these mutations on KatG function need to be analyzed further. The lack of activity or lower activity of these mutants, however, correlated quite well with the INH-resistant phenotype of their respective M. tuberculosis isolates. The enzymatic activity of KatGL48Q-R463L was not correlated with INH susceptibility (Table 5), and this mutation had little effect on the measured activities (Table 5 and Fig. 2C). The isolate carrying the L48Q-R463L mutations also had the −15C→T transition upstream of mabA (Table 4), which is known to be associated with INH resistance (10, 22, 39). The KatGA245V and KatGR463L mutants showed activities similar to those of wild-type KatG, and these results are consistent with the INH-susceptibility phenotypes of their respective isolates. Therefore, we concluded that the L48Q, A245V, and R463L mutations are merely polymorphisms that do not influence INH resistance.

We found mutations in the region upstream of mabA or in the regulatory region of the mabA-inhA operon in 12 of 38 INH-resistant isolates. Five of these isolates had no other mutations within katG (Table 4). Our present results support those of Morris et al. (16), who examined the inhA locus for sequence polymorphisms by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and DNA sequencing of 42 INH-resistant isolates. They found no alterations in the coding portion of inhA, but five isolates had mutations in the regulatory region of the mabA-inhA operon (16).

Mutations in kasA, which encodes β-ketoacyl ACP synthase (11), and ndh, which encodes NADH dehydrogenase (12), have been found in a small proportion of clinical isolates, and we plan to modify our sequencing method to analyze ndh and kasA.

Our method was sufficient for diagnosis of EMB-resistant isolates, although a limited portion (80%) of embB was sequenced. EMB inhibits polymerization of cell wall arabinan of arabinogalactan and of lipoarabinomannan (39). Three homologues of arabinosyltransferases, EmbC, EmbA, and EmbB, have been proposed to be the targets of EMB (32, 39). Mutations in embB are found in 47% to 69% of EMB-resistant isolates of M. tuberculosis (28, 32). Most EMB-resistant isolates with embB mutations exhibited high-level resistance (2, 27). The 35% of EMB-resistant isolates that do not have embB mutations showed decreased resistance to EMB (2). We were able to detect a majority (15/18 isolates) of EMB-resistant isolates with our sequencing-based analysis. In addition, we identified two novel mutations, D354A and N296Y, in EMB-resistant isolates in the present study.

pncA is known to be associated with PZA resistance (17, 39). In the present study, we sequenced the complete open reading frame of pncA and its promoter region. PZA enters the organism through passive diffusion and is converted to pyrazinoic acid by cytoplasmic PZase. Despite recent progress, the targets of pyrazinoic acid are still not known (39). All PZA-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates tested in the present study contained at least one mutation within pncA and showed no PZase activity (Table 4). Our results are consistent with those of previous studies that showed 72% to 95% of PZA-resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis carried pncA mutations (25). All of the pncA mutations identified in the present study of PZA-resistant isolates caused amino acid substitutions. Among these mutations, 5A3E, D53N, P54L, C72W, and M175V were novel. The pncA mutations were highly diverse and scattered across the gene.

STR, an aminoglycoside, inhibits initiation of mRNA translation. The site of action is the small 30S subunit of the ribosome, especially ribosomal protein S12 and the 16S rRNA (17). M. tuberculosis becomes resistant when targets of STR in the ribosomes are mutated. The principal site of mutation is the rpsL gene, which encodes ribosomal protein S12 (6, 19, 27). The most frequently observed mutation in rpsL was K43R. In the present study, 13 of 30 STR-resistant isolates tested had the K43R mutation. Mutation of the rrs gene is also associated with STR resistance in M. tuberculosis. M. tuberculosis has only a single copy of the rrs gene, which encodes the 16S rRNA. Thus, the loops of 16S rRNA that interact with the S12 protein constitute an easily selected mutation site. Such rrs mutations are clustered in the highly conserved 530 loop and in the adjacent 915 region (6). In addition, a 1400A→G mutation of rrs was identified in both amikacin- and kanamycin-resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis (1, 29). These isolates were resistant to STR, indicating that this mutation may contribute to STR resistance (1, 29). In the present study, one STR-resistant isolate had two mutations, 1400A→G and 1539A→G. Because the STR resistance of the isolate can be explained by the 1400A→G mutation, it is unclear whether the 1539A→G mutation is associated with STR resistance.

FQs are active in vitro against M. tuberculosis isolates (5) and are increasingly being used in combination with other agents to treat tuberculosis. The principal mechanism of resistance to FQs identified in other bacterial species is alteration of the target proteins DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. DNA gyrase is composed of two A and two B subunits, which are encoded by gyrA and gyrB, respectively (39). Mutations in gyrA are associated with high-level resistance of M. tuberculosis to FQs (39). gyrB mutations associated with resistance have only been identified in laboratory mutants of M. tuberculosis (39). Mutations associated with FQ resistance occur within a relatively restricted region of gyrA. We identified three mutations, A90V, D94GA, and D94G, in FQ-resistant isolates. We also identified a polymorphism, S95T, that is not associated with FQ resistance. The G88C, D89G, S91P, and D94A, -N, -H, or -Y mutations in gyrA have also been found in FQ-resistant isolates (4, 30). These mutations are presumed to be located in the FQ-binding region (4, 30).

Some researchers have described mutations that caused amino acid substitutions but not drug resistance (30, 33, 39). In the present study, we identified several novel mutations that cause amino acid substitutions but do not confer drug resistance. Except for these mutations and silent mutations, the drug resistance profiles of the isolates tested correlated quite well with the various mutations that we identified (Table 6). The sensitivities of the DNA sequencing-based method (i.e., the ability to detect true drug resistance) were 100%, 89.5%, 83.3%, 100%, 60%, and 100% for the RIF-, INH-, EMB-, PZA-, STR-, and OFX-resistant strains, respectively. The specificities (i.e., the ability to detect true drug susceptibility) were 100% for all drugs tested. The test efficiencies (i.e., the ability to give the correct answer in all samples tested) were 100%, 97.1%, 97.8%, 100%, 91.3%, and 100% for the RIF-, INH-, EMB-, PZA-, STR-, and OFX-resistant strains, respectively. These results indicate that our DNA sequencing-based method is effective for detection of MDR strains. However, when novel mutations in drug resistance-related genes are detected by our method, it is essential to also perform drug susceptibility testing, because novel mutations are not necessarily associated with drug resistance. Of the 25 novel mutations we detected, we cloned 7 novel mutations in KatG. Significant information could be gained if all novel mutations were cloned. For practical purposes, it would be helpful to know the phenotypic manifestations of specific mutations.

In conclusion, we have shown the usefulness of our DNA sequencing strategy for drug susceptibility screening of various targets. Most MDR M. tuberculosis strains, which are defined as those strains resistant to both RIF and INH, are resistant to other antitubercular drugs. Our new sequencing-based method can rapidly and efficiently assess MDR of M. tuberculosis. The method can also be used to detect MDR M. tuberculosis in sputa from patients. Further studies will focus on the clinical application of this method for diagnosis of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis.

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Nakano (Jichi Medical School, Saitama, Japan) for comments on the manuscript, B. L. Triggs-Raine (University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada) for providing katG-deficient E. coli UM262, and A. S. Swierzko (Centre for Microbiology and Virology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland) for coordinating the international collaborative study.

This study was supported by Health Sciences Research grants from the Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare of Japan (H15-SHINKO-3 and H18-SHINKO-IPPAN-012).

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 15 November 2006.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alangaden, G. J., B. N. Kreiswirth, A. Aouad, M. Khetarpal, F. R. Igno, S. L. Moghazeh, E. K. Manavathu, and S. A. Lerner. 1998. Mechanism of resistance to amikacin and kanamycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1295-1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alcaide, F., G. E. Pfyffer, and A. Telenti. 1997. Role of embB in natural and acquired resistance to ethambutol in mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2270-2273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Banerjee, A., M. Sugantino, J. C. Sacchettini, and W. R. Jacobs, Jr. 1998. The mabA gene from the inhA operon of Mycobacterium tuberculosis encodes a 3-ketoacyl reductase that fails to confer isoniazid resistance. Microbiology 144:2697-2704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barnard, F. M., and A. Maxwell. 2001. Interaction between DNA gyrase and quinolones: effects of alanine mutations at GyrA subunit residues Ser83 and Asp87. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1994-2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen, C. H., J. F. Shih, P. J. Lindholm-Levy, and L. B. Heifets. 1989. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of rifabutin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated before treatment of patients in Taiwan. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 140:987-989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Finken, M., P. Kirschner, A. Meier, A. Wrede, and E. C. Bottger. 1993. Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Mol. Microbiol. 9:1239-1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fluit, A. C., M. R. Visser, and F.-J. Schmitz. 2001. Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:836-871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garnier, T., K. Eiglmeier, J. C. Camus, N. Medina, H. Mansoor, M. Pryor, S. Duthoy, S. Grondin, C. Lacroix, C. Monsempe, S. Simon, B. Harris, R. Atkin, J. Doggett, R. Mayes, L. Keating, P. R. Wheeler, J. Parkhill, B. G. Barrell, S. T. Cole, S. V. Gordon, and R. G. Hewinson. 2003. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:7877-7882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heym, B., P. M. Alzari, N. Honore, and S. T. Cole. 1995. Missense mutations in the catalase-peroxidase gene, katG, are associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 15:235-245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lavender, C., M. Globan, A. Sievers, H. Billman-Jacobe, and J. Fyfe. 2005. Molecular characterization of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates collected in Australia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:4068-4074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee, A. S. G., I. H. K. Lim, L. L. H. Tang, A. Telenti, and S. Y. Wong. 1999. Contribution of kasA analysis to detection of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Singapore. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2087-2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee, A. S. G., A. S. M. Teo, and S.-Y. Wong. 2001. Novel mutations in ndh in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2157-2159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Loewen, P. C., J. Switala, M. Smolenski, and B. L. Triggs-Raine. 1990. Molecular characterization of three mutations in katG affecting the activity of hydroperoxidase I of Escherichia coli. Biochem. Cell Biol. 68:1037-1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miller, L. P., J. T. Crawford, and T. M. Shinnick. 1994. The rpoB gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:805-811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miller, M. A., L. Thibert, F. Desjardins, S. H. Siddiqi, and A. Dascal. 1995. Testing of susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide: comparison of Bactec method with pyrazinamidase assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2468-2470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Morris, S., G. H. Bai, P. Suffys, L. Portillo-Gomez, M. Fairchok, and D. Rouse. 1995. Molecular mechanisms of multiple drug resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 171:954-960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Musser, J. M. 1995. Antimicrobial agent resistance in mycobacteria: molecular genetic insights. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:496-514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nagy, J. M., A. E. Cass, and K. A. Brown. 1997. Purification and characterization of recombinant catalase-peroxidase, which confers isoniazid sensitivity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem. 272:31265-31271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nair, J., D. A. Rouse, G. H. Bai, and S. L. Morris. 1993. The rpsL gene and streptomycin resistance in single and multiple drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 10:521-527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardia, and other aerobic actinomycetes. Tentative standard M24-T2, 2nd ed. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. [PubMed]
  • 21.Otsuka, Y., P. Parniewski, Z. Zwolska, M. Kai, T. Fujino, F. Kirikae, E. Toyota, K. Kudo, T. Kuratsuji, and T. Kirikae. 2004. Characterization of a trinucleotide repeat sequence (CGG)5 and potential use in restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3538-3548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ramaswamy, S. V., R. Reich, S.-J. Dou, L. Jasperse, X. Pan, A. Wanger, T. Quitugua, and E. A. Graviss. 2003. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1241-1250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Roberts, G. D., N. L. Goodman, L. Heifets, H. W. Larsh, T. H. Lindner, J. K. McClatchy, M. R. McGinnis, S. H. Siddiqi, and P. Wright. 1983. Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for recovery of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from acid-fast smear-positive specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:689-696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rouse, D. A., J. A. DeVito, Z. Li, H. Byer, and S. L. Morris. 1996. Site-directed mutagenesis of the katG gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: effects on catalase-peroxidase activities and isoniazid resistance. Mol. Microbiol. 22:583-592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Scorpio, A., P. Lindholm-Levy, L. Heifets, R. Gilman, S. Siddiqi, M. Cynamon, and Y. Zhang. 1997. Characterization of pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:540-543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Scorpio, A., and Y. Zhang. 1996. Mutations in pncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, cause resistance to the antituberculous drug pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus. Nat. Med. 2:662-667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sreevatsan, S., X. Pan, K. E. Stockbauer, D. L. Williams, B. N. Kreiswirth, and J. M. Musser. 1996. Characterization of rpsL and rrs mutations in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from diverse geographic localities. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1024-1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sreevatsan, S., K. E. Stockbauer, X. Pan, B. N. Kreiswirth, S. L. Moghazeh, W. R. Jacobs, Jr., A. Telenti, and J. M. Musser. 1997. Ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: critical role of embB mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1677-1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Suzuki, Y., C. Katsukawa, A. Tamaru, C. Abe, M. Makino, Y. Mizuguchi, and H. Taniguchi. 1998. Detection of kanamycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by identifying mutations in the 16S rRNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1220-1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Takiff, H. E., L. Salazar, C. Guerrero, W. Philipp, W. M. Huang, B. Kreiswirth, S. T. Cole, W. R. Jacobs, Jr., and A. Telenti. 1994. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:773-780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Telenti, A., P. Imboden, F. Marchesi, D. Lowrie, S. Cole, M. J. Colston, L. Matter, K. Schopfer, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Detection of rifampicin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet 341:647-650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Telenti, A., W. J. Philipp, S. Sreevatsan, C. Bernasconi, K. E. Stockbauer, B. Wieles, J. M. Musser, and W. R. Jacobs, Jr. 1997. The emb operon, a gene cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis involved in resistance to ethambutol. Nat. Med. 3:567-570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.van Doorn, H. R., E. J. Kuijper, A. van der Ende, A. G. A. Welten, D. van Soolingen, P. E. W. de Haas, and J. Dankert. 2001. The susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to isoniazid and the Arg→Leu mutation at codon 463 of katG are not associated. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1591-1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wayne, L. G. 1974. Simple pyrazinamidase and urease tests for routine identification of mycobacteria. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 109:147-151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wei, C.-J., B. Lei, J. M. Musser, and S.-C. Tu. 2003. Isoniazid activation defects in recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis catalase-peroxidase (KatG) mutants evident in InhA inhibitor production. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:670-675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu, S., S. Chouchane, and R. S. Magliozzo. 2002. Characterization of the W321F mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis catalase-peroxidase KatG. Protein Sci. 11:58-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yu, S., S. Girotto, X. Zhao, and R. S. Magliozzo. 2003. Rapid formation of compound II and a tyrosyl radical in the Y229F mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis catalase-peroxidase disrupts catalase but not peroxidase function. J. Biol. Chem. 278:44121-44127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang, Y., B. Heym, B. Allen, D. Young, and S. Cole. 1992. The catalase-peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature 358:591-593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang, Y., and A. Telenti. 2000. Genetics of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, p. 235-254. In G. F. Hatfull and W. R. Jabobs (ed.), Molecular genetics of mycobacteria. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  • 40.Zumia, A., and J. M. Grange. 2001. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis—can the tide be turned? Lancet Infect. Dis. 1:199-202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES