Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 29;45(2):627–630. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00816-06

TABLE 2.

Performance of OptiMAL in detecting persistent blood-stage infections compared to standard light microscopy: tabulation of paired OptiMAL and microscopy results and assessment of the ability of OptiMAL to detect treatment failures

Microscopy result OptiMAL result
Day 2 (n = 223)
Day 7 (n = 235)
Day 14 (n = 240)
P. falciparuma Non- P. falciparumb Negative Performance (%)c P. falciparum Non- P. falciparum Negative Performance (%) P. falciparum Non- P. falciparum Negative Performance (%)
Asexual formsd
    P. falciparum 21 9 32 5 0 2 2 0 7
    Non-P. falciparum 1 3 3 2 1 2 2 1 1
    Negative 48 15 91 44 6 173 13 5 209
OptiMAL performance
    Sensitivity 49.3 66.7 38.5
    Specificity 59.1 77.6 92.1
    PPV 35.1 13.8 21.7
    NPV 72.2 97.7 96.3
a

Test positive for P. falciparum-specific antigen. This indicates the presence of a P. falciparum or mixed P. falciparum/non-P. falciparum infection.

b

Test positive for panmalaria antigen but no P. falciparum-specific band visible. This is indicative of a non-P. falciparum infection but does not completely rule out the presence of low-level P. falciparum parasitemia.

c

Evaluated for positive (irrespective of species detected) versus negative results, as follows: sensitivity, TP/(TP + FN); specificity, TN/(FP + TN); PPV (positive predictive value), TP/(TP + FP); NPV (negative predictive value), TN/(TN + FN) (where TP is true positive, TN is true negative, FP is false positive, and FN is false negative).

d

As the presence of asexual blood-stage parasites only indicates treatment failure, slides with gametocytes only were scored as negative.