TABLE 1.

Identification and susceptibility testing results for 61 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae tested by BMD and VITEK 2

Reference identification	No. of isolates tested	Organism in VITEK 2 database	VITEK 2 identification	VITEK 2 MIC report generatedb	VITEK 2 susceptibility interpretation by AESc
Budvicia aquatica	1	No	NAa	Yes	NA
Buttiauxella agrestis	1	Yes	Isolate reported as unidentified	Yes	No
Buttiauxella brennerae	1	No	NA	Yes	NA
Buttiauxella ferragutiae	1	No	NA	Yes	NA
Buttiauxella gavinae	1	No	NA	Yes	NA
Buttiauxella izardii	1	No	NA	Yes	NA
Buttiauxella noackie	1	No	NA	Yes	NA
Buttiauxella warmboldiae	1	No	NA	No; organism misidentified as B. agrestis, which is not considered valid for susceptibility testing	NA
Cedecea davisae	3	Yes	1 isolate reported as unidentified; 2 isolates reported as C. davisae	Yes	Yes
Cedecea lapagei	1	Yes	C. lapagei	Yes	Yes
Cedecea neteri	1	Yes	Isolate misidentified as C. davisae	Yes	Yes
Edwardsiella tarda	5	Yes	E. tarda	Yes	Yes
Ewingella americana	5	Yes	E. americana	Yes*	Yes*
Hafnia alvei	5	Yes	1 isolate reported as unidentified; 4 isolates reported as H. alvei	Yes	Yes
Kluyvera ascorbata	2	Yes	K. ascorbata	Yes	Yes
Kluyvera cryocrescens	3	Yes	K. cryocrescens	Yes	Yes
Leminorella grimontii	2	No	NA	Yes	NA
Leminorella richardii	2	No	NA	Yes	NA
Leminorella sp. strain 3	1	No	NA	Yes	NA
Moellerella wisconsensis	5	Yes	M. wisconsensis	No; organism not considered valid for susceptibility testing	No
Photobacterium damsela	4	Yes	P. damsela	No; organism not considered valid for susceptibility testing	No
Pragia fontium	2	No	NA	Yes	NA
Rahnella aquatilis	5	Yes	R. aquatilis	No; organism not considered valid for susceptibility testing	No
Tatumella ptyseos	1	No	NA	Insufficient growth for MIC†	NA
Xenorhabdus sp.	1	No	NA	Insufficient growth for MIC†	NA
Yokenella regensburgei	5	No	NA	Yes*	NA

^aNA, not applicable.

^b*, one isolate did not show sufficient growth for MIC determination; †, tested on multiple occasions with the same result.

^cAES, Advanced Expert System; NA, not applicable.