Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 27;45(3):691–697. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01393-06

TABLE 2.

Clustering results by genotyping methods

Methoda No. of unique isolates No. of clustered isolates No. of clusters No. of distinct types Clustering rate (%)b
Spoligotyping 56 98 16 72 53.2
MIRU-VNTR 12 old 84 70 20 104 32.5
MIRU-VNTR 12 old + 3 ETR 103 51 13 116 24.7
MIRU-VNTR 12 old + spoligotyping 106 48 14 120 22.1
IS6110-RFLP 115 39 13 128 16.9
    Low-copy-no. isolates 8 6 2 10 NR
    High-copy-no. isolates 107 33 11 118 NR
MIRU-VNTR 15 115 39 12 127 17.5
MIRU-VNTR 24 117 37 11 128 16.9
MIRU-VNTR 15 + spoligotyping 120 34 11 131 14.9
MIRU-VNTR 24 + spoligotyping 120 34 11 131 14.9
a

MIRU-VNTR 12 old, original set of 12 MIRU-VNTR loci as described previously (26, 27), MIRU-VNTR 12 old + 3 ETR, original set of 12 MIRU-VNTR loci plus three nonredundant exact-tandem-repeat loci (8), MIRU-VNTR 15 and 24, discriminatory subset of 15 loci and full set of 24 loci (Table 1) (24).

b

NR, not relevant.