TABLE 2.
Pyrosequencing and VITEK 2 results of the alpha-hemolytic blood culture isolates
| Group and no. | Pyrosequencing resulta
|
VITEK 2 result
|
Unresolved (n)d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Scoreb | Species | Confidence levelc (n) | ||
| S. anginosus group | |||||
| 7 | S. anginosus | 100 | S. anginosus | Exc (4) | |
| S. anginosus or S. gordonii | LD (2) | ||||
| Inconclusive identification | — (1) | 1 | |||
| 3 | S. anginosus | 96.9 | S. anginosus | Exc (1) | |
| S. anginosus or S. gordonii | LD (2) | ||||
| 6 | S. intermedius | 100 | S. intermedius | Exc (4) | |
| S. intermedius or S. constellatus subsp. pharyngis | LD (1) | ||||
| S. constellatus subsp. pharyngis | Good (1) | ||||
| 3 | S. constellatus | 100 | Inconclusive identification | — (2) | 2 |
| S. pyogenes, S. constellatus subsp. constellatus, or S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis | LD (1) | ||||
| 2 | S. constellatus or S. intermedius | 96.9 | S. constellatus subsp. constellatus | Exc (1) | |
| S. constellatus subsp. constellatus, S. gordonii, or S. anginosus | LD (1) | 1 | |||
| S. sanguinis group | |||||
| 7 | S. sanguinis | 100 | S. sanguinis | Exc (6) or Good (1) | |
| 2 | S. sanguinis | 96.9 | S. sanguinis | Exc (2) | |
| 5 | S. sanguinis | 93.7 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (2), VG (1), or Good (1) | 4 |
| S. mitis/S. oralis or S. constellatus subsp. pharyngis | LD (1) | 1 | |||
| 4 | S. sanguinis | 90.5 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (2), VG (1), or Good (1) | 4 |
| 1 | S. gordonii | 100 | S. gordonii | Exc (1) | |
| 1 | S. gordonii | 87.4 | S. gordonii | Exc (1) | |
| S. salivarius group | |||||
| 5 | S. salivarius or S. vestibularis | 100 | S. salivarius | Exc (3) | |
| S. infantarius | VG (1) | 1 | |||
| Unidentified organism | — (1) | 1 | |||
| 2 | S. salivarius or S. vestibularis | 96.9 | S. salivarius | Exc (2) | |
| S. mitis group | |||||
| 4 | S. mitis | 100 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (1), VG (1), Good (1), or Acc (1) | |
| 1 | S. oralis | 100 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (1) | |
| 24 | S. mitis, S. pneumoniae, or S. pseudopneumoniae | 96.9 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (10), VG (5), or Good (3) | |
| S. pluranimalium or S. mitis/S. oralis | LD (1) | 1 | |||
| S. mitis/S. oralis or S. constellatus susbp. pharyngis | LD (1) | ||||
| Unidentified organism | — (4) | 4 | |||
| 6 | S. infantis | 93.7 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (2), VG (2), or Good (1) | |
| Unidentified organism | — (1) | 1 | |||
| 1 | S. oralis | 93.7 | S. mitis/S. oralis | VG (1) | |
| 1 | S. oralis | 90.5 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (1) | |
| 1 | S. peroris | 93.7 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (1) | |
| 3 | S. mitis or S. oralis (v2)e | 100 | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (1) VG (1), Good (1) | |
| S. bovis group | |||||
| 2 | S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus | 100 | S. gallolyticus | Exc (2) | |
| 2 | S. bovis or S. lutetiensis | 100 | S. infantarius | VG (1), Exc (1) | |
| 1 | S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurinanus | 100 | S. pasteurianus | Exc (1) | |
| 2 | S. bovis or S. lutetiensis | 96.9 | S. infantarius | Exc (1) | |
| S. gallolyticus, S. lutetiensis/bovis or S. hyointestinalis | LD (1) | ||||
| Undefined group | |||||
| 2 | S. oralis or S. gallinaceus (v1)e | 100 | S. parasanguinis | VG (1) | 1 |
| S. parasanguinis or S. mitis/S. oralis | LD (1) | 1 | |||
| 1 | Both regions heterogeneousf | S. mitis/S. oralis | Exc (1) | 1 | |
The isolates have been listed according to the pyrosequencing result.
The score is a measure of the relatedness of the studied sequence to the type strain sequence determined by the Identifire software. Score 100 is given to sequences that are identical to each other.
Confidence level is a measure of the strength of the VITEK analysis in the descending order Exc (excellent), VG (very good), good, Acc (acceptable), and LD (low discrimination). If VITEK 2 analysis resulted in low discrimination between two species and an additional Voges-Proskauer test proposed by the device could discriminate the species, the final result is in boldface.
The number of isolates having discrepant pyrosequencing and VITEK 2 results at the group level.
The isolates with a heterogeneous sequence in either region were identified using the other region.
One isolate had heterogeneous sequences in both regions, and hence it could be identified only as Streptococcus by pyrosequencing.