Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Mar 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Jan;109(1):216–231. doi: 10.1121/1.1326083

TABLE I.

Summary of subjective attenuation measurements in this study and previous reports using similar earmuffs and earplugs. Attenuations are specified in dB (mean±1 standard deviation). Attenuations for this study are based on data in N ears; the datum for each ear is the average of 1–3 measurements. The previous studies of earmuff attenuation used Bilson UF-1 earmuffs,a presented mean results for several types of earmuffs,b or did not specify the type used.c The previous studies of earplug attenuation used E.A.R® Classic® foam earplugsa or did not specify the type used.c

Subjective attenuation of various sound stimuli (dB)
Stimuli
Imager noise Tone bursts
Isolation device
This study
Number
of ears N
1.5-T
(1 kHz)
3.0-T
(1.4 kHz)
500 Hz 1 kHz 1.4 kHz 2 kHz 2.8 kHz
Earmuffs 5 30±6.0 37±3.9 32±6.9 37±4.7 34±7.9 35±3.8
Earplugs 3 26±6.1 25±0.8 28±4.2 27±6.8 35±2.4 41±1.0
Earmuff/earplug combination 8 41±68 39±4.0 41±8.6 41±6.5 39±6.5 47±7.1 48±5.8
Helmet/earmuff combination 3 47±2.7 52±1.7 50±0 58±6.9 56±10.4 64±6.4
Helmet/earmuff/earplug combination 5 57±9.7 63±9.9 58±5.5 55±7.3 63±9.7 66±5.8 82±2.1
Stimuli: 1/3-octave bandwidth noise bursts except as noted
 Other studies 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1 kHz 1.4 kHz 2 kHz 3.15 kHz

Earmuffs, “Subject fit”a  7.4±3.6 14.0±3.4 20.7±3.3 29.2±3.8 31.7±4.2
Earmuffs, mean of several studiesa  9±3.6  12±4.0  19±4.7  27±4.9  28±5.2
Earmuffsb Stimuli: pure tones  13±4.5  19±5.5  26±5.5  34±7.0  32±6.5 33±8.0
Earplugs, “Subject fit”a 21.4±7.8 22.0±7.8 24.2±7.8 25.2±6.9 31.0±4.7
Earplugs, mean of several studiesa  17±9.0  17±8.7  20±9.2  22±8.5  29±8.3
Earmuff/earplug combinationc 37.5±4.6 41.8±5.1 51.3±6.7 47.8±4.2 37.3±3.5 46.8±4.5
a

Compiled by Berger et al., 1998.

c

Berger, 1983, for “small-volume” earmuffs and earplugs inserted to “standard depth” (50%–60% of earplug in ear canal).