Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr;97(4):667–675. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.083782

TABLE 3—

Average Milk Intake Effect Sizes, by Type of Research Design

Cross-Sectional Longitudinal Overall
r (95% CI) No.a r (95% CI) No.a r (95% CI) No.a
Gender
    Male −0.20* (−0.24, −0.16) 2 −0.15 (−0.39, 0.11) 1 −0.20* (−0.24, −0.16) 3
    Female −0.19* (−0.22, −0.16) 4 −0.12 (−0.24, 0.01) 2 −0.19* (−0.22, −0.16) 6
    Mixed −0.10* (−0.11, −0.08) 11 −0.25 (−0.32, −0.17) 3 −0.10* (−0.11, −0.09) 14
Age group
    Children −0.12 (−0.13, −0.11) 14 −0.21 (−0.27, −0.15) 5 −0.12 (−0.13, −0.11) 19
    Adults −0.09 (−0.12, −0.07) 2 . . . . . . −0.09 (−0.12, −0.07) 2
Type of beverage
    Sugared soda −0.06* (−0.08, −0.05) 6 −0.19 (−0.26, −0.10) 2 −0.07* (−0.08, −0.05) 8
    Mixed/other −0.19* (−0.21, −0.17) 9 −0.25 (−0.34, −0.15) 3 −0.19* (−0.21, −0.18) 12
Soda intake
    Self-reported −0.11 (−0.12, −0.10) 15 −0.17* (−0.23, −0.10) 4 −0.12* (−0.13, −0.11) 19
    Measured . . . . . . −0.58* (−0.70, −0.43) 1 −0.58* (−0.70, −0.43) 1
Milk intake
    Self-reported −0.11 (−0.12, −0.10) 15 −0.21 (−0.27, −0.15) 5 −0.12 (−0.13, −0.11) 20
    Measured . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjusted values
    No −0.09* (−0.10, −0.08) 9 −0.23 (−0.29, −0.16) 4 −0.10* (−0.11, −0.08) 13
    Yes −0.19* (−0.21, −0.16) 6 −0.14 (−0.28, 0.00) 1 −0.18* (−0.21, −0.16) 7
Industry funded
    No −0.15* (−0.16, −0.13) 9 −0.31 (−0.40, −0.21) 3 −0.15* (−0.16, −0.14) 12
    Yes −0.06* (−0.08, −0.04) 6 −0.15 (−0.23, −0.07) 2 −0.06* (−0.08, −0.05) 8

Note. CI = confidence interval.

aNumber of studies included in the analysis.

* P < .0056 (adjusted for multiple comparisons) for differences in effect sizes within each column and research design variable.