Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep 13;96(6):3194–3208. doi: 10.1152/jn.00484.2006

TABLE 1.

Comparison of intrinsic membrane and firing properties in layer 1 cells from transgenic (n = 13) vs. wild-type (n = 130) mice

Parameter Animal Mean ± SD P Value
ERest, mV GAD-GFP -63.4 ± 2.63 0.0710
Wild type -61.7 ± 5.76
τmem, ms GAD-GFP 10.9 ± 4.86 0.8624
Wild type 11.2 ± 5.30
RUI, Gω GAD-GFP 0.186 ± 0.0667 0.5492
Wild type 0.163 ± 0.135
I-VSlope ratio GAD-GFP 1.09 ± 0.0877 0.5528
Wild type 1.10 ± 0.0864
VThresh, mV GAD-GFP 27.2 ± 1.41 0.8224
Wild type 26.4 ± 2.16
I-FSlope, spk/pA GAD-GFP 0.334 ± 0.156 0.3338
Wild type 0.291 ± 0.151
ISIRatio GAD-GFP 0.554 ± 0.306 0.4506
Wild type 0.641 ± 0.399
IHW,spk, ms GAD-GFP 0.703 ± 0.175 0.3011
Wild type 0.780 ± 0.261
ASpl, mV GAD-GFP 58.2 ± 12.7 0.1284
Wild type 63.5 ± 11.7
tpk,AHP GAD-GFP 0.149 ± 0.138 0.5938
Wild type 0.164 ± 0.0905
AAHP, mV GAD-GFP 12.5 ± 2.03 0.02617
Wild type 10.6 ± 2.89

Parameter values were compared using unpaired Student’s t-tests, with a significance level of 0.005 to correct for multiple comparisons.